My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Letter April 11 2008 Concerning Comments of the SOuthwester Water Conservation District in response to Notice of Availability of Draft San Juan Public Lands Land Management Plan and Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Letter April 11 2008 Concerning Comments of the SOuthwester Water Conservation District in response to Notice of Availability of Draft San Juan Public Lands Land Management Plan and Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2014 4:49:32 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 5:25:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Comments on the SJLP
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
4/11/2008
Author
Sheftel, Janice
Title
Letter April 11 2008 Concerning Comments of the SOuthwester Water Conservation District in response to Notice of Availability of Draft San Juan Public Lands Land Management Plan and Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. 1 <br />April 11, 2008 <br />Page 29 <br />It is the best high - priority Colorado River authorized fishery in the Forest in the <br />Dolores River ... GMU. Rio Lado was selected by the Forest Service as the <br />better of two cutthroat populations on Forest Lands in the water shed. <br />Draft Plan, Appendix D, p. D -21. (Emphasis added) <br />The Rio Lado has been closed to grazing in the Rio Lado Allotment Management Plan, currently <br />under an Environmental Assessment process. These measures will improve the CRCT <br />population. Therefore, a WSR eligibility designation is inappropriate. <br />The ORV of CRCT in the Rio Lado is not based on an appropriate Area of Consideration, <br />even if Colorado has agreed to have "five separate, viable but inter - connected sub - <br />populations in each ... GMU." Id. <br />The Rio Lado is not a third order stream, which the SJPLC has stated is one of the criteria for <br />WSR Eligibility. Funds have already been invested in barrier improvements on the Rio Lado <br />riparian corridor, raising the question of a free flowing stream. Further, it is only "thought" that <br />each GMU CRCT population has slightly different genetics. Appendix D, at p. D -21. The <br />unique genetics would need to be proven. <br />Although land along the Rio Lado is currently classified by Montezuma County as agricultural, <br />this classification could change, increasing conflicts with a WSR eligibility designation. The <br />SWCD concurs with the conclusion that if the Rio Lado continues to be designated as eligible in <br />the Final Plan, it should not be designated as suitable. <br />3. West Dolores River <br />The presence of a few black swift nests on the Falls and Eagle Creek tributaries of the West <br />Dolores River does not rise to the level of an ORV within a regional or national "Area of <br />Consideration," or even within Colorado, in the context of approximately 50 nesting pairs at Box <br />Canyon Falls. Nests have persisted at Box Canyon for many decades, with no apparent adverse <br />impact from a large number of visitors accessing the nesting area via metal stairs to view the <br />swifts. In addition, the Draft Plan admits to utilizing an inappropriate Area of Consideration, in <br />that of the ten streams with black swift nests on the SJPL, three were chosen for ORVs. Draft <br />Plan, Appendix D, at p. D -25. The San Juan Public Land is not a regional or national Area of <br />Consideration. <br />A WSR eligibility designation for the West Dolores River based on black swift nests not on the <br />mainstem, but only under tributary waterfall areas, is inappropriate. Black swift nests on a <br />tributary cannot support a WSR eligibility designation on the mainstem. Draft Plan, Appendix <br />D, at p. D -25, clearly states that "the black swift builds nests only at waterfalls ". No such <br />waterfalls occur on the mainstem. In addition, the West Dolores River is not "nationally known" <br />for fishing, neither does it rise to the level of exemplary even within Western Colorado, when <br />compared to other river systems, such as the Gunnison. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.