Laserfiche WebLink
. 1 <br />April 11, 2008 <br />Page 29 <br />It is the best high - priority Colorado River authorized fishery in the Forest in the <br />Dolores River ... GMU. Rio Lado was selected by the Forest Service as the <br />better of two cutthroat populations on Forest Lands in the water shed. <br />Draft Plan, Appendix D, p. D -21. (Emphasis added) <br />The Rio Lado has been closed to grazing in the Rio Lado Allotment Management Plan, currently <br />under an Environmental Assessment process. These measures will improve the CRCT <br />population. Therefore, a WSR eligibility designation is inappropriate. <br />The ORV of CRCT in the Rio Lado is not based on an appropriate Area of Consideration, <br />even if Colorado has agreed to have "five separate, viable but inter - connected sub - <br />populations in each ... GMU." Id. <br />The Rio Lado is not a third order stream, which the SJPLC has stated is one of the criteria for <br />WSR Eligibility. Funds have already been invested in barrier improvements on the Rio Lado <br />riparian corridor, raising the question of a free flowing stream. Further, it is only "thought" that <br />each GMU CRCT population has slightly different genetics. Appendix D, at p. D -21. The <br />unique genetics would need to be proven. <br />Although land along the Rio Lado is currently classified by Montezuma County as agricultural, <br />this classification could change, increasing conflicts with a WSR eligibility designation. The <br />SWCD concurs with the conclusion that if the Rio Lado continues to be designated as eligible in <br />the Final Plan, it should not be designated as suitable. <br />3. West Dolores River <br />The presence of a few black swift nests on the Falls and Eagle Creek tributaries of the West <br />Dolores River does not rise to the level of an ORV within a regional or national "Area of <br />Consideration," or even within Colorado, in the context of approximately 50 nesting pairs at Box <br />Canyon Falls. Nests have persisted at Box Canyon for many decades, with no apparent adverse <br />impact from a large number of visitors accessing the nesting area via metal stairs to view the <br />swifts. In addition, the Draft Plan admits to utilizing an inappropriate Area of Consideration, in <br />that of the ten streams with black swift nests on the SJPL, three were chosen for ORVs. Draft <br />Plan, Appendix D, at p. D -25. The San Juan Public Land is not a regional or national Area of <br />Consideration. <br />A WSR eligibility designation for the West Dolores River based on black swift nests not on the <br />mainstem, but only under tributary waterfall areas, is inappropriate. Black swift nests on a <br />tributary cannot support a WSR eligibility designation on the mainstem. Draft Plan, Appendix <br />D, at p. D -25, clearly states that "the black swift builds nests only at waterfalls ". No such <br />waterfalls occur on the mainstem. In addition, the West Dolores River is not "nationally known" <br />for fishing, neither does it rise to the level of exemplary even within Western Colorado, when <br />compared to other river systems, such as the Gunnison. <br />