Laserfiche WebLink
April 11, 2008 <br />Page 10 <br />A fourth "stick ", Draft Plan, Volume 2, p. 107, statement C. 9, states that the <br />SJPLC will seek water rights for "fisheries" protection when only the CWCB may appropriate <br />instream flow rights in Colorado. The statement violates the "Four Cornerstones" policy set out <br />below. <br />A fifth "stick ", Draft Plan, Volume 2, p. 253, statement B, suggests that the <br />SJPLC will require "conservation pools ", although this proposal violates federal agency <br />recognition of state supremacy in water rights allocations. Under the GMUG National Forest <br />Pathfinder process, it was recognized that the Forest would not "take" water rights. Any <br />dedication of a water right for a reservoir needs to come from a willing "seller ", with <br />appropriate payment or federal agency participation in a reservoir's development only with <br />federal cost sharing. <br />E. The Draft Plan is Inconsistent with Other Forest Plans in Colorado. <br />The Department of Agriculture ( "Department ") has recognized that water and habitat related <br />standards in land management plans must be consistent among forests. See Discretionary <br />Review Decision on the Chief's Appeal Decision Regarding the White River National Forest <br />Revised Land and Resource Management Plan ( "White River Review Decision ") at 9. The <br />White River Review Decision recognizes "Four Cornerstones" for managing water resources on <br />the National Forests summarized as: <br />eThe Department respects the authority of States to allocate water available for appropriation, <br />and to manage water quality under the Clean Water Act. <br />*The Department respects valid, existing rights. <br />*The Forest Service is responsible for managing water uses on National Forest System lands <br />consistent with both State and federal law, as required under the Organic Administration Act of <br />1897, the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960, and the Federal Land Policy and <br />Management Act. <br />•Water resource management objectives on National Forest System lands will be managed <br />through cooperation with States, other federal agencies, tribal governments, local government, <br />holders of valid water rights, and other interested parties, rather than through unitary regulatory <br />action on the part of the Forest Service. <br />In reliance upon these "Four Cornerstones" and the Forest Service MOU with the State of <br />Colorado regarding the management of water resources on National Forest System Lands, the <br />Department has determined that water standards for national forest "shall be unambiguous, <br />achievable, and avoid conflict between federal and State law to the maximum extent <br />practicable." Id. at 10 -11. <br />