My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hermosa Creek Workgroup Meeting 13 Summary April 7 2009 Draft
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Hermosa Creek Workgroup Meeting 13 Summary April 7 2009 Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2014 4:35:32 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
River Protection Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
4/7/2009
Author
River Protection Workgroup
Title
Hermosa Creek Workgroup Meeting 13 SUmmary April 7 2009 Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />John Taylor of Hinsdale County said he does not believe a WSR designation <br />provides the protections people imagine. He said he doesn't consider the Poudre <br />as "wild and scenic" any more, but he doesn't know what it would have looked <br />like if it hadn't been designated. <br />Ann Oliver said there may be middle ground between the minimum ISF and the <br />FRWR. There are unknowns about future human needs but there are also <br />ecosystem needs that should be considered. The geomorphology of a stream <br />needs to be taken into account along with the future human needs. <br />John Taylor said anyone interested can check out aztrails.org to learn about the <br />protection of Arizona's Verde River, which involved a process similar to this one <br />that began 20 years ago. Local groups are involved in management there. <br />Next meeting: The next meeting of the Hermosa Workgroup will be Tuesday, <br />May 5, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m., at the Durango Recreation Center. The group <br />members said they found this format useful for discussing scenarios but did not <br />want to make the meetings longer than two hours. There was a comment that, at <br />that rate, it will take eight months to go through the remainder of the scenarios. <br />Marsha said some of the other scenarios won't take as long to discuss as the <br />WSR designation did. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.