My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Goals for Hermosa Creek Draft May 11 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Goals for Hermosa Creek Draft May 11 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2014 4:34:10 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
River Protection Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
5/11/2009
Author
River Protection Workgroup
Title
Goals for Hermosa Creek Draft May 11 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
05/11/2009 MON 10:03 FAX 9702598423 Southwestern Water Cons 0001 /001 <br />30 3 I V to `>; `E; 7 ff <br />Goals for Hermosa Creek <br />(draft 1 — 5/11/09 <br />• Protect the values as defined by the Working Group statement <br />• Protect the watershed and Hermosa Creek itself <br />• Preserve the intact nature of the area (e.g,, road -less features) <br />• Allow <some> (descriptive word to use ?) level of water development to continue <br />• Reduce of sedimentation of the Creek <br />• Protect existing outstanding water quality <br />• Increase collaboration and problem solving among and between users and user <br />groups <br />Principles of Hermosa Creek Work group Recommendation and Future Actions <br />(actions and recommendation steps built around these) <br />1) The watershed and the Creek itself are the focus of the recommendations. It is <br />difficult to develop recommendation without taking into account both: the land <br />and the water, <br />2) The recommendations should create management flexibility because the area is <br />used by a variety of user groups for many different, and sometimes competing, <br />purposes. Thus, future recommendations should include a diversity of <br />approaches ranging from actions on the Federal, State and Local levels building in <br />as much flexibility and local control as is possible while also potecting t11e <br />resources. <br />3) Future actions should establish ways the users of Hermosa Creek will continue to <br />work together to collaboratively resolve conflicts and challenges, and to provide <br />input to the USFS. <br />4) The recommendations should have a lasting effect ffect (note: word permanent is <br />Problematic for some) so the area can be maintained for future generations. <br />5) Hermosa Creek is a very special place for a variety of reasons. Future actions <br />need to consider and address the variety of interests, opportunities and concerns <br />raised in this process as well as previous planning efforts for Hermosa Creek. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.