My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Hermosa Creek Workgroup Questions for Each Scenario
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Agenda Hermosa Creek Workgroup Questions for Each Scenario
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2014 4:32:27 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
River Protection Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Author
River Protection Workgroup
Title
Agenda Hermosa Creek Workgroup Questions for Each Scenario
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hermosa Creek Working Group <br />Questions for Each Scenario <br />(working draft) <br />1. Please describe the scenario and tools that are proposed. <br />2. What do this scenario and the tools proposed accomplish (brief)? <br />3. How does this scenario protect important values in Hermosa Creek and its <br />watershed? <br />4. Address, to the best extent you can, the following issues: <br />a) What part of the creek or watershed does this scenario <br />cover? <br />b) Which values does the scenario address? <br />c) Is public or private land involved? <br />d) Where does the scenario fall in the level of hierarchy (see <br />below)? <br />e) What is the relative level of permanency? <br />f) What is the relative level of local control? <br />g) What is the relative level of flexibility? <br />h) Will this scenario likely reduce or increase sedimentation in <br />the Hermosa Creek area? <br />i) Will this scenario increase the usage of the area? <br />j) Could this scenario reduce conflicts among user groups <br />and /or address conflicts between users? <br />k) Might this scenario retain the value of multiple use? <br />1) Will this scenario be restrictive of future water <br />development? If so, how? <br />m) If possible, estimate how much water is needed for this <br />scenario. <br />5. How do the tools in the scenario actually work ""on the ground" (i.e., how <br />are they instituted, implemented, administered, managed, etc.)? <br />6. How does the scenario address various concerns, issues and interests <br />raised by the Working Group? <br />7. What else would you like the Working Group to know about this <br />scenario...? <br />8. Other <br />Presented by Mark Stiles, USFS /BLM at the December 2008 Meeting: <br />(left to right is progressively more local control) <br />-U.S. Constitution <br />- Treaty <br />- Statute (e.g., National Conservation Areas, Wilderness Areas, <br />Wild and Scenic Rivers, etc.) <br />- Regulation (e.g., the Roadless Rule) <br />- Agency policy (USFS /BLM) <br />- USFS /BLM Resource management plan <br />- Project plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.