Laserfiche WebLink
by allocating lands to general management areas that reflect different levels of <br />development and suitable uses; <br />2. Designation of (a) Research Natural Areas (RNAs) for USFS lands and Areas of <br />Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs) for BLM- administered lands; and (b) suitable <br />timber land and the establishment of allowable sale quantities for USFS lands. <br />3. Recommendation of lands for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation <br />System ( "NWPS "). (USFS only, BLM recommendations are considered through separate, <br />legislative Environmental Impact Statements.) <br />4. Identification of river segments as eligible or suitable for inclusion in the National <br />Wild and Scenic Rivers System ( "WSRS "). <br />5. Allocation of livestock forage (AUMs) and areas available for livestock grazing <br />on BLM- administered lands. <br />The management of rivers and their associated values is subject to the overall desired <br />outcomes described in a LMP. For instance, desired condition statements about <br />maintaining or enhancing water quality could frame the future management of rivers and <br />their watersheds. The establishment of criteria, such as plan standards or guidelines, <br />could further define management actions to be taken or the decision -space available <br />during consideration of specific activities that may affect river values. <br />General management area allocations pull together desired outcomes and management <br />criteria and may establish the overall management approach for a given area. The <br />management of streams located within these management areas could be affected by the <br />levels of development or management activity associated with each management area. <br />Specific designations or land allocations made in LMPs may also directly effect the <br />management of rivers. The designation of an RNA or ACEC provides more specific <br />guidance on management of the particular area. For instance, an ACEC intended to <br />protect a rare aquatic plant community could require additional scientific study, <br />management actions to enhance wetland vegetation or desired flow regimes, or design <br />criteria for adjacent land uses to prevent degradation of the community. <br />Recommendations for inclusion in the NWPS or findings of suitability for inclusion in <br />the WSRS require the agencies to manage the identified lands or stream segments and <br />adjacent corridors to preserve Congress' option to consider legislation either to establish a <br />new Wilderness Area or a WSR. Such recommendations or findings may be <br />accompanied by other LMP components, such as desired outcomes or management <br />criteria to protect identified values pending action by Congress. In the case of a finding <br />of suitability for inclusion as a WSR, the SJPLC is required to manage the stream <br />corridor to protect the ORVs identified in the LMP. If, for instance, the ORV were a <br />native fishery, actions could be required to maintain or enhance fish habitat, including <br />water quality. Managing for habitat could include specific enhancement projects or the <br />7 <br />