My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Second Draft Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report November 2 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Second Draft Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report November 2 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2014 3:43:58 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:26:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
11/2/2009
Author
River Protection Workgroup
Title
Second Draft Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report November 2 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Roadless Area <br />Within the SMA, establish a permanent Road -less Area using the current map of the <br />Inventoried Roadless Area. (Several boundary adjustments are under discussion namely related to the SWSI <br />site). <br />Sedimentation <br />The HCW discussed the fact that sedimentation in the Creek, while an issue, is hard to <br />quantify both in terms of the amount and sources. Therefore, the group agreed that: <br />Standards for roads and /or trails need to be bolstered to reduce sedimentation caused by human <br />activity. The appropriate forum is to work on this is with the USFS. <br />Proposed Land Exchange <br />During the HCW process, a proposed land exchange process was occurring that would, if <br />finalized, bring the 160 acres of private lands in the Hermosa Creek watershed into USFS <br />ownership. This was discussed on many occasions. A policy was agreed to by HCW regarding <br />this proposed land exchange (note: the comment period ended 10/30/09): <br />• support the USFS' goal to have an the watershed be comprised of in -tact Public <br />Lands; <br />• it is noted that some HCW members' have concerns about the potential <br />development of the private lands in the watershed and the possible impacts; <br />• it is also noted that these lands are private property and many in the group <br />support private property rights; and <br />• the HCW did not choose not to take a position on the current proposed land <br />exchange in the formal EIS public comment period. <br />Advisory Council <br />The establishment of a community -based Hermosa Creek Advisory Council is <br />recommended to continue to allow many diverse people and organizations to work togetherfor <br />the betterment of the Hermosa Creek watershed through education, projects, providing public <br />input to the USFS, and mainly: to promote overall stewardship endeavors. It is recommended <br />this Advisory Council not be included in the Hermosa Creek Legislation but rather that it be set <br />Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report: Second Draft 11/2/09 FiFADFaft: ',,28�09 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.