My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Second Draft Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report November 2 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Second Draft Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report November 2 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2014 3:43:58 PM
Creation date
4/28/2014 2:26:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
11/2/2009
Author
River Protection Workgroup
Title
Second Draft Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report November 2 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Relative level of Local Control <br />• Relative level of flexibility <br />• Hermosa Creek Watershed Value Addressed <br />(Find the matrix on the Web site.) <br />Also, as the group began to assess various tools for protection, Mark Stiles offered a <br />chart that showed the hierarchy of federal laws and regulations as follows (from the highest to <br />the lowest in terms of local control): <br />• -U.S. Constitution <br />• - Treaty <br />• - Statute (e.g., National Conservation Areas, Wilderness Areas, <br />Wild and Scenic Rivers, etc.) <br />• - Regulation (e.g., the Roadless Rule) <br />• - Agency policy <br />• - Resource management plan <br />• - Proiect plan <br />He noted that there is greater permanency but less flexibility and less local control as <br />one moves up the scale from the bottom to the top. Finding a set of tools that supported and <br />bolstered local control and involvement became one theme of the group. <br />Drafting Committee Forms and HCW Consensus Recommendations <br />A working group of this size has great advantages. However, at this juncture, a smaller <br />group that became known as the Hermosa Creek Drafting Committee (hereinafter referred to as <br />"'HCDC') was formed to work out details and bring recommendations back to the larger HCW. <br />Those who volunteered to serve on the group include: Steve Fearn, Meghan Maloney, Chuck <br />Wanner, Bruce Whitehead, Mely Whiting, Jeff Widen, and Ed Zink with Thurman Wilson (or <br />Dave Baker) advising from the SJPLC and with John Whitney, from Congressman Salazar's <br />office ex officio as well. The group decided early on to continue using the HCW facilitator, <br />Marsha Porter- Norton. This Drafting Committee met a total of _times from June to' <br />A framework the HCDC agreed to operate within in Attachment E. The HCDC worked within <br />established a diversity of goals and interests expressed by based en the HCW. A particular <br />Hermosa Creek Workgroup Final Report: Second Draft 11/2/09 PFSt DFaf*: 10 28f09 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.