My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10825 Water Supply Alternative Summary Phase 2 Assessment January 2008 Draft
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
10825 Water Supply Alternative Summary Phase 2 Assessment January 2008 Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2017 11:22:03 AM
Creation date
4/14/2014 1:20:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
A report from the Grand River Consulting Corporation on alternatives for delivering 10,825 AF of water to the 15-mile reach of the Colorado River.
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2008
Author
Grand River Consulting Corporation
Title
10825 Water Supply Alternative Summary Phase 2 Assessment January 2008 Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
significantly improve aquatic conditions. Tens of cfs of water can make a substantial <br />difference in this narrow segment of the Colorado River headwater. <br />k) The release of 10825 Water from Williams Fork, Wolford Mountain, or Green Mountain <br />reservoirs will not markedly improve aquatic conditions of the upper Colorado River. The <br />use of these reservoirs has less affect on the upper Colorado River than we initially <br />anticipated. The release of Recovery Program water will either have no significant impact, <br />or a negative impact to aquatic life and recreation. Because the channel of the Colorado <br />River below the confluence with the Blue River is large, and because stream flow is naturally <br />greater at this downstream location, the release of 10825 Water does not substantially alter <br />aquatic conditions in this reach of the river. <br />1) The viability of Granby Reservoir as a source of 10825 Water is not known at this time. <br />6.4 FRYINGPAN RIVER / RUEDI RESERVOIR <br />m) Recovery Program releases from Ruedi Reservoir will degrade aquatic conditions and <br />recreation use of the Fryingpan River. The relative magnitude of the adverse impact will <br />vary depending upon the amount of 10825 Water, the specific release schedule, and natural <br />hydrologic conditions that vary a lot between dry and wet years. <br />n) The economic benefits associated with sport fishing on the Fryingpan River are substantial. <br />A perception may exist that any impact to the Fryingpan River will be unacceptable from <br />aquatic conditions, recreation and economic perspectives. However, if a portion or even all <br />of the 10825 Water is supplied from Ruedi Reservoir, the Fryingpan River below the <br />reservoir will remain a very productive fishery with significant economic benefits. <br />o) If all Recovery Program releases from Ruedi Reservoir, including "5 & 5" and 10825 Water, <br />can be spread out over the July to October period (i.e. potentially make the Green Mountain <br />Reservoir surplus declaration earlier), any adverse impacts to the Fryingpan River will be <br />reduced. <br />p) In the near -term, impacts associated with 10825 Water releases from Ruedi Reservoir would <br />be similar to the existing impacts associated with the release of the "2012 Recovery <br />Program Water ". The largest change in stream flow of the Fryingpan River, and the largest <br />impacts to aquatic conditions and recreation, will occur at some point in the future as the <br />West Slope demand for contracted water from Ruedi Reservoir increases. As contract <br />releases increase in the future, the incremental impact of 10825 Water releases from Ruedi <br />Reservoir will be more significant. <br />q) The release of 10825 Water from Ruedi Reservoir will not substantially affect aquatic <br />conditions or recreation of the Roaring Fork River below Basalt. Because the channel of the <br />Roaring Fork River below the confluence with the Fryingpan River is large, and because <br />10325 t,Nater Supply Study Phase 2 Alternatives Assessment January 2008 Draft 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.