My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10825 Water Supply Alternative Summary Phase 2 Assessment January 2008 Draft
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
10825 Water Supply Alternative Summary Phase 2 Assessment January 2008 Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2017 11:22:03 AM
Creation date
4/14/2014 1:20:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
A report from the Grand River Consulting Corporation on alternatives for delivering 10,825 AF of water to the 15-mile reach of the Colorado River.
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2008
Author
Grand River Consulting Corporation
Title
10825 Water Supply Alternative Summary Phase 2 Assessment January 2008 Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.0 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: "A to Z" <br />Through the evaluation process, the study team has developed the following key observations. <br />These observations are important for the 10825 Steering Committee to consider as this group <br />evaluates specific alternatives to fulfill both the obligations of the Water Providers under the <br />Programmatic Biological Opinion AND to support the broader goals of actually recovering the <br />target fish species through the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. These <br />observations also strongly influenced the identification of the most promising alternatives, <br />which are presented later in this summary. <br />6.1 BENEFIT TO THE ENDANGERED FISH RECOVERY PROGRAM <br />a) Six alternatives are recommended as most promising in this report. Each of these <br />alternatives would benefit the 15 Mile Reach by providing 10,825 acre feet of water per <br />year. <br />b) The water sources available to the Recovery Program (Green Mtn. Reservoir surplus, Ruedi <br />Reservoir 5 & 5 water, Wolford Mtn fish pool, and 10825 Water) will not increase stream <br />flow in the 15 Mile Reach to the point that the USFWS target flow prescriptions are met in <br />dry years, or even in below average years. While minimum dry year targets call for 810 cfs <br />(1,240 cfs in below average years) in the 15 Mile Reach, the release of all the available <br />Recovery Program water will maintain a flow of less than half of the targets (about 400 to <br />500 cfs) in drier years. <br />c) It is important to efficiently manage and coordinate releases of the 10825 Water along with <br />all other Recovery Program sources of water, in order to maintain as consistent a flow as <br />possible in the 15 Mile Reach, especially in drier than average years when flow targets will <br />not be met. <br />d) The completion of fish passage improvements at the Price -Stubb dam will provide the <br />endangered fish with new access to lengthy segments of the Colorado River that have <br />relatively high stream flow throughout the year. When all of the related fish passage <br />elements that have been put in place on the Colorado River are operational, they will have a <br />positive impact on the potential recovery of the endangered fish. The provision of 10825 <br />Water, while important, may have less impact on the recovery of the fish than other <br />Recovery Program elements such as the fish passage improvements. <br />e) Releases of 10825 Water from alternatives that utilize Sulphur Gulch Reservoir would <br />provide the most benefit to the 15 Mile Reach and to the Recovery Program, as long as <br />appropriate operational and design criteria are implemented. This facility is close to the 15 <br />Mile Reach, and reservoir releases can be timed in response to fluctuating stream flow of <br />the Colorado River. The flexibility in release patterns associated with Sulphur Gulch <br />Reservoir would maximize the effectiveness of the limited water supplies available to the <br />W5 VA.'at3r Suppl y Study Phase 2 `Ater at vos tsse; sment January 2008 Drat 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.