Laserfiche WebLink
production without a well permit and, where necessary, a decree <br />adjudicating an augmentation plan. Dist. Ct. Water Div. 7 <br />Order: Motions for Summary Judgment, July 2, 2007. This direct <br />appeal followed. <br />We now affirm the water court. The 1969 Act defines <br />"beneficial use" as "the use of that amount of water that is <br />reasonable and appropriate under reasonably efficient practices <br />to accomplish without waste the purpose for which the <br />appropriation is lawfully made." § 37- 92- 103(4), C.R.S. (2008). <br />Under the language of the 1969 Act, the CBM process "uses" water <br />by extracting it from the ground and storing it in tanks -- <br />to "accomplish" a particular "purpose" -- the release of methane <br />gas. The extraction of water to facilitate CBM production is <br />therefore a "beneficial use" as defined in the 1969 Act. We <br />reject the Engineers' and BP's argument that water used in CBM <br />production is merely a nuisance rather than a "beneficial use." <br />On the contrary, the use of water in CBM production is an <br />integral part of the CBM process itself. The presence and <br />subsequent controlled extraction of the water makes the capture <br />of methane gas possible. As our precedent in the gravel cases <br />makes clear, the fact that the water used during the CBM process <br />may become a nuisance after it has been extracted from the <br />ground and stored in above - ground tanks (that is, after it has <br />been beneficially used) does not prevent a finding that the <br />5 <br />