My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07SA293 Advance Sheet Headnote The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 The Colorado Ground Water management Act beneficial use well appropriation
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
07SA293 Advance Sheet Headnote The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 The Colorado Ground Water management Act beneficial use well appropriation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 11:10:56 AM
Creation date
4/14/2014 12:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Colorado Supreme Court opinion regarding classifying use of water for coalbed methane production as a beneficial use.
State
CO
Date
4/20/2009
Title
07SA293 Advance Sheet Headnote The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 The Colorado Ground Water management Act beneficial use well appropriation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JUSTICE COATS, concurring in part and dissenting in part. <br />Although I agree that the extraction of groundwater in the <br />coalbed methane ( "CBM ") production process falls within the <br />administrative responsibilities of the state and division <br />engineers, I do not agree that this process, in itself, amounts <br />to a "beneficial use" of the water extracted, for either <br />constitutional or statutory purposes. Furthermore, since the <br />engineers have an obligation to regulate the removal of the <br />waters of the state from their natural course or location, <br />whether they are diverted for beneficial use or not, I do not <br />consider it either necessary or appropriate to resolve the <br />question of beneficial use as a declaratory judgment for the <br />protection of senior appropriators. I therefore respectfully <br />dissent from all but the conclusion of part II. C. of the <br />majority's opinion. <br />The division engineer has a statutory obligation to order <br />the discontinuance of any diversion not necessary for <br />application to a beneficial use, as well as any diversion of <br />water required to satisfy senior rights. § 37- 92- 502(2)(a), <br />C.R.S. (2008). The state and division engineers would have us <br />read this provision as requiring them to order discontinuance <br />only to the extent necessary to prevent material injury to <br />senior water rights, but otherwise they do not deny their <br />obligation. In fact, however, section 502(2)(a) contains two <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.