My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07SA293 Advance Sheet Headnote The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 The Colorado Ground Water management Act beneficial use well appropriation
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
07SA293 Advance Sheet Headnote The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 The Colorado Ground Water management Act beneficial use well appropriation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 11:10:56 AM
Creation date
4/14/2014 12:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Colorado Supreme Court opinion regarding classifying use of water for coalbed methane production as a beneficial use.
State
CO
Date
4/20/2009
Title
07SA293 Advance Sheet Headnote The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 The Colorado Ground Water management Act beneficial use well appropriation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
facilitate CBM production is not a beneficial use of water. <br />While we may take into account agency interpretations, we are <br />not bound by them. See Colo. Mining Ass'n v. Bd. of County <br />Commis, 199 P.3d 718, 731 -32 (Colo. 2009). Here, the <br />Engineers' interpretation of the term "beneficial use" is <br />contrary to the 1969 Act's definition of that term. Their <br />interpretation also conflicts with our case law interpreting the <br />term. We therefore decline to defer to the Engineers' <br />interpretation. <br />C. <br />In their final argument, the Engineers assert that the <br />legislature intended that CBM wells be regulated not by them but <br />rather exclusively by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation <br />Commission. They contend that, rather than subjecting oil and <br />gas wells to possibly overlapping, inconsistent, or conflicting <br />regulatory requirements, the General Assembly recognized and <br />sought to protect the regulatory authority of the COGCC. We <br />disagree with the Engineers' argument and hold that COGCC does <br />not have exclusive regulatory authority over the extraction of <br />water in CBM production. <br />In support of their argument, the Engineers point to the <br />fact that the COGCC has been given extensive authority to <br />regulate the production of oil and gas. See Oil and Gas <br />Conservation Act, §§ 34 -60 -101 through -129, C.R.S. (2008). <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.