Laserfiche WebLink
As the water court noted, the Ranchers' central concern is <br />the protection of their vested senior water rights. We agree <br />with the district court that our prior appropriation system <br />exists to protect water rights holders. Here, the extraction, <br />storage, and reinjection of water during CBM make the water <br />inaccessible to other water rights holders such as the Ranchers. <br />When the water is stored in surface tanks, a small quantity is <br />lost to evaporation. At a later time, the water is typically <br />reinjected, via underground injection control wells, into <br />designated geologic formations that lie deeper than the aquifer <br />from which the methane is produced. Consequently, "beneficial <br />use" also means use of water for a designated purpose -- the <br />result of which is to make the water inaccessible to other water <br />rights holders. See, e.g., Three Bells, 758 P.2d at 171 <br />(noting, "we believe that when mining operations affect water <br />rights it is necessary for the operator to achieve compliance <br />with the Ground Water Management Act and the 1969 Act." <br />(emphasis added)). <br />In response to the Ranchers' concern about injury to their <br />vested senior water rights, the Engineers, joined by BP, argue <br />18 <br />