Laserfiche WebLink
(IV) Whether exercise of the recreational in- channel diversion <br />would cause material injury to instream flow water rights <br />appropriated pursuant to subsections (3) and (4) of this section; <br />(V) Whether adjudication and administration of the recreational in- <br />channel diversion would promote maximum utilization of waters <br />of the state as referenced in paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this <br />section; and <br />(VI) Such other factors as may be determined appropriate for <br />evaluation of recreational in- channel diversions and set forth in <br />rules adopted by the board, after public notice and comment. <br />§ 37- 92- 102(6)(a) and (b). The CWCB is then directed to report its findings to the water court <br />for review pursuant to section 37- 92- 305(13). The General Assembly directed that water judges <br />must apply the same factors, and the findings and recommendation of the CWCB are <br />presumptive as to such facts, subject to rebuttal. § 37- 92- 305(13);. Cf. Chatfeld East Well Co., <br />Ltd. v. Chatfield East Prop. Owners Ass'n, 956 P.2d 1260, 1266 (Colo. 1998) (noting that the <br />water court must apply the standards of the Groundwater Management Act, and must consult <br />with the state engineer and give presumptive effect to the state engineer's findings of fact.) <br />These factors, along with the limits on the size and scope of an RICD in the definition of <br />an RICD, which is then included in the definitions of "diversion" and "beneficial use," require <br />water judges to determine the allowable size and scope of a water right for RICD purposes. The <br />language could not be clearer: an RICD is limited to the "minimum stream flow as it is ... <br />placed to a beneficial use between specific points defined by physical control structures ... for a <br />reasonable recreation experience on the water." § 37- 92- 103(10.3); see Beeghly, 20 P.3d at 612- <br />13 ( "In determining statutory purpose, we first look to the language used by the legislature and <br />give words their commonly accepted and understood meaning. When the language is clear and <br />unambiguous, it may be presumed that the legislature meant what it clearly stated in the <br />statute. ") (citations omitted). <br />13 <br />