Laserfiche WebLink
VI /'LO /U4 1J: dy rA:i JVJ /2fOG " /ll <br />D 411.�J r1Vt1 O[ IIlLL WJVVJ <br />to limit the Applicant's claim concerning the size and scope of a water right for RICD purposes <br />to the minimum stream flow required jlor a reasonable recreational experience" as required by the <br />RICD statute places these efforts at great risk. The views of these amici will assist the Court in <br />understanding the issues presented by-his appeal and the consequences of affirming the water <br />court's decree. <br />Pursuant to C.A.R. 29, the brief of the amici curiae is conditionally filed with this motion <br />for leave. <br />Respectfully submitted this 26�' day of July, 2004. <br />HILL & ROBBINS, P.C. <br />By: <br />David W. Robbins, #6112 <br />Dennis M. Montgomery, #6424 <br />Jennifer H. Hunt, #29964 <br />1441 18`h Street, Suite 100 <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br />Attorneys for The Rio Grande Water <br />Conservation District and <br />Southwestern Water Conservation District <br />MAYNES, BRADFORD, SHIPPS & <br />SHEFTEL <br />Frank E. (Sam) Maynes, #1363 <br />John Barlow Spear, 413878 <br />The West Building <br />Suite 123 <br />835 E. 2nd Avenue <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />Attorneys for Southwestern Water <br />Conservation District <br />BURNS, F1GA & WILL, P.C. <br />• <br />y. <br />e E. Miller, 426663 <br />6400 South Fiddlers Green Circle <br />Suite 1030 <br />Englewood, CO 80111 <br />Attorney for Southeastern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District and the Colorado Farm <br />Bureau <br />