Laserfiche WebLink
l <br /> CHAPTER 1 `. <br /> INTRODUCTION,PURPOSE OF,AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT <br /> Citizen's Coalition Conceptual Alternative, focused on providing <br /> the Colorado Ute Tribes with funds to ,t' <br /> se water from existing projects,and/or the acquisition of existing direct flow water rights,as well <br /> purchase <br /> as the use and/or modification of existing federal facilities. <br /> a No result, was reached on any of the alternatives developed during the Romer Proposal to process. As <br /> a ressult,on August 11, 1998,the Secretary of Interior presented an Administration <br /> the Settlement Act. The proposal calls for a down-sized dam and <br /> and other project Basin to supply ply <br /> municipal and industrial (M&I)Z water to the Colorado Ute <br /> ji the Animas-La Plata Water Conservancy District(ALPWCD),and the San Juan <br /> the N avaJ o Nation, ro The proposal also contains a non-structural element as part of the <br /> Water Commission(SJWC)). P P <br /> ttlem P d <br /> ent im lementation. Further,under the Administrative Proposal,Alternatives the(ALP Project was size to96 <br /> m <br /> match the depletions permitted in the Reasonable and Prudent <br /> Biological Opinion for the ALP Project. This opinion limited the average at the Biological to <br /> l <br /> final 0 acre- OP <br /> 57,100 acre-feet/year(afy). See Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1.2 for further <br /> Opinion. <br /> these proposals represent a significant modification of the ALP Project evaluated previously, ' <br /> Because th p P 1999,Reclamation announced its intent to <br /> additional environmental analysis is required. On January 4, <br /> The DSEIS <br /> a Draft SEIS (DSEIS)to the 1996 FSFES(Federal al water rights may besett ed. The DSEIS was <br /> prepare <br /> analyzed various ways in which the Colorado Ute Tn <br /> released for public review and comment on January 14, 2000 following p ublication in the Federal <br /> Notice of Availability. Following release of the DSEIS,public hearings were held on <br /> Register of the N New Mexico,and Denver,Colorado, <br /> February 15, 16,and 17,2000 in Durango,Colorado;Farmington,000. Volumes 3a and 3b of this FSEIS <br /> respectively. The public comment period closed on April <br /> include copies of all comments received during the public comment period and Reclamation's responses <br /> comments. A Record of Decision will be prepared following release of the FSEIS. <br /> to those 's <br /> 1.2 PROJECT HISTORY <br /> authorized by the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968 ew e located in ALP <br /> The ALP Project was a in northwestern <br /> ' Plata County in southwestern Colorado and in San Juan County supplies to the Colorado Ute Tribes and other <br /> Project was designed to provide irrigation and M&I water supp (Settlement project beneficiaries. A Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Final Setttlaement Agreement December 10, 1986, <br /> � . P J <br /> Agreement)(see Attachment A located in Volume 2 of this FSEIS) <br /> quantified the Colorado Ute Tribes' water rights. The water rights allow the Colorado Ute Tribes <br /> , y which q <br /> obtain water from several rivers and projects,including water supplied from the ALP Project. In 1988, <br /> to obt <br /> ess incorporated the ALP Project into the Settlement Act in order to settle Colorado Ute Tribal <br /> Co n gr <br /> water rights claims. <br /> 1868 treaty entered into between the United States and the Colorado Ute Tribes,the <br /> As a result acquired an 18 �' encompassing much of southwestern Colorado. That reservation <br /> provides the Tribes acquired a large reservation encomp g <br /> Colorado Ute Tribes with significant reserved water rights on rivers and streams throughout <br /> the region. <br /> The Colorado Ute Tribes' water rights are senior to most non-Colorado Ute Indian water <br /> i <br /> ect,M&I refers to water for industries and cities,as well as for livestock and wildlife uses, <br /> = '-For purposes of this P ro J <br /> recreation,and tourism development. <br /> 4 1 1-2 <br /> 1.2 PROJECT HISTORY <br />