My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150307 Final Supplimental Impact Statement
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
C150307 Final Supplimental Impact Statement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2014 12:59:10 PM
Creation date
4/8/2014 3:04:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150307
Contractor Name
Animas La Plata
Contract Type
Loan
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
senior water rights,the ALP Project as proposed provides a dependable l Navajo Nat on spply supply <br /> neighboring Indian and non-Indian community water needs, including J <br /> Shiprock,New Mexico,the Animas La Plata Water Conservancy is the (ate W of D)and do the San <br /> the Juan La <br /> IWater Commission(SJWC). In addition,water would be provided <br /> Plata Conservancy District in New Mexico from the Colorado Ute Tribal allocation. <br /> It should be noted that the non-federal parties of the Settlement Agreement,working with their <br /> congressional representatives,have introduced proposed legislation <br /> The t o F . 3 12 and and 2508)in <br /> reflects response <br /> to the Administration Proposal and the ongoing NEPA process. project <br /> the reality that the pending legislation will likely result in benefits to the Colorado Ute Indian Tribes that <br /> eliminate the irrigation component and provide substitute ene <br /> are equivalent to those that the Tribes would have received under the Settlement Act. See Chapter 2, <br /> Section 2.1.1 for further discussion of this issue. <br /> Water Rights of the Colorado Ute Tribes <br /> Based on the Supreme Court's decision in Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564(1908),when Congress <br /> or the President establishes an Indian Reservation,there is reserved the amount of water necessary in <br /> order to accomplish the purposes of the reservation. Under the iterthe priority <br /> oof at <br /> etunique <br /> which the reservation is entitled is no later than the date of creation <br /> aspects of Indian reserved water rights is that they are not subject to the beneficial use requirements("use <br /> or lose")of state water law. Indian water rights,therefore,may not be diminished for failing to meet a <br /> beneficial use standard under state law. As a general rule, <br /> Indian water rights are very senior and <br /> because these rights are premised on sufficient water being reserved to insure full utilization of the <br /> purposes of the reservation,both presently and in the future, Indian water rights are usually sizeable in <br /> quantity. <br /> The Colorado Ute Tribes'reserved water rights arise from an 1868 treaty <br /> was with"the <br /> apart for the absolute. 15 s at <br /> 619. This treaty states that the land which is now part of the res <br /> and undisturbed use and occupation"by the Colorado Ute Tribes. Art.XIII. Additionally,the treaty <br /> provides for the basic tools, facilities and livestock needed to become self-sustaining. Based on these <br /> broad purposes,the tribes are entitled to make a claim for water in the Animas and La Plata basins. The <br /> Colorado Ute Tribes have over 25,000 acres of arable land in the immediate <br /> the vicinity <br /> for a 80zeable water <br /> which were to be irrigated by the original ALP Project) and therefore <br /> rights claim based solely on the agricultural purposes of their reservations. In return for not asserting a <br /> possibly sizeable claim, the Colorado Ute Tribes will receive a much smaller amount of"wet water"for <br /> settling their Winters rights. <br /> , the <br /> Because the Animas La Plata project is a settlement of the Colorado with Ute Tribal federal law. As of his time the <br /> ultimate use of the water is left to tribal discretion in accordance <br /> tribes have not conclusively specified to what end uses they will put their water. Because NEPA requires <br /> the federal government to make a reasonable projection of the potential environmental onn developed ante que ces of <br /> any proposed action,Reclamation, in conjunction with input from the P <br /> use scenarios on how the Tribes could put their water to use in order to effectively evaluate the potential <br /> environmental effects of settling the water rights claims of the Colorado Ute Tribes and providing for <br /> identified M&I uses in the project area. Reclamation believes that this approach fulfills the requirements <br /> of NEPA while not impinging upon the sovereignty of the Colorado Ute Tribes. <br /> i <br /> 4 Any future actions would be subject to future environmental review,and NEPA compliance would be <br /> "triggers"for <br /> required as part of any approval by a federal agency. Future federal actions would serve as trig <br /> future NEPA compliance activities, and could include future connection to a federal facility for water <br /> conveyance enlargement or extension of certain existing conveyance systems, and, certain uses of a water <br /> ES-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.