Laserfiche WebLink
Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation MWSI Process <br /> • scenarios that do not involve borrowing and/or recharge; <br /> • use of alternative sources of surface water supply; <br /> • sensitivity of yields to various levels of demand in the Denver Water service <br /> area; and <br /> • sensitivity of yields to peaking storage availability. <br /> Based upon the modeling results, the alternative sources of surface water supply, and <br /> resulting return flows,potential environment impacts and permitting issues were <br /> generally identified. It was anticipated that early awareness of environmental concerns <br /> would be useful for purposes of formulating specific conjunctive use proposals and for <br /> identifying interested parties and potential approaches to mitigation. <br /> In the Phase III POS, it was also anticipated that the consulting team would provide <br /> technical support for a conjunctive use demonstration project to test the concepts of <br /> recharge, borrowing and payback and to provide assistance in the establishment of <br /> operating rules and accounting requirements. However,there was no activity under this <br /> task, and it was concluded that it would not be feasible to implement such a <br /> demonstration project within the time frame for completion of the MWSI. <br /> Phase III investigations of effluent management included refinements to the Phase II <br /> inventory of reusable supplies , development of a reusable return flow model and <br /> database, estimation of future levels of reusable return flows, and collaboration with <br /> Denver Water to refine estimates of future exchange potential. These efforts involved <br /> analyses of water rights and reusable supplies owned by several water providers that were <br /> not included in PACSM. Phase III work in this area also addressed the potential for <br /> pooling of reusable effluent and altering the timing of use of reusable sources in order to <br /> increase the reliability of reusable return flows for substitution and reuse purposes. <br /> In the area of interruptible supply, the Phase II report provided an overview of concepts, <br /> alternative approaches, and a regional quantification of agricultural supplies that could <br /> conceptually be made available for such arrangements. The Northern Colorado Water <br /> Conservancy District expressed concerns that the Phase II draft report"overemphasizes <br /> the potential for water transfers from the Northern Front Range to the Denver <br /> Metropolitan area." While the intent of the interruptible supply concept was to protect <br /> and continue existing water uses by allowing only temporary transfers,Northern <br /> municipal water providers were concerned about the need to reserve adequate water <br /> supply for growth within their area and the potential economic, social, and environmental <br /> impacts. In response to these concerns, the Phase III POS included further study of <br /> perceived barriers to interruptible supply. This was to address perceptions and <br /> underlying causes of barriers and approaches to overcoming such barriers. However, as <br /> Phase III proceeded, the PMT felt that additional analysis of these issues should be <br /> postponed pending regional planning efforts to be undertaken by Northern municipal <br /> water providers. A Northern Regional Water Coalition has subsequently been formed to <br /> undertake these efforts. Ultimately,the MWSI did not study interruptible supply <br /> arrangements beyond Phase II. In the area of interruptible supply, this report therefore <br /> includes only an updated version of the Phase II report. <br /> 10 <br /> Prepared for the Colorado Water Conservation Board,Colorado Department of Natural Resources by <br /> Hydrosphere Resource Consultants,1002 Walnut Street,Suite 200,Boulder,CO 80302 <br />