My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fesability Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Fesability Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2014 11:01:56 AM
Creation date
4/1/2014 11:01:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contractor Name
Pine River Irrigation District
Contract Type
Loan
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Source: L. 21: p. 519, § 3. C.L. § 2059. CSA: C. 90, § 434. CRS 53: § 149-2-3. C.R.S. 1963: § <br /> 150-2-3. <br /> C.J.S. See 94 C.J.S., Waters, § § 319(2),321. <br /> 37-42-104. Hearing - adjournments. In case the state engineer considers the proposed <br /> irrigation system feasible, and shall so state in his report, or shall report his inability to reach a <br /> definite conclusion with reference thereto, the board of county commissioners shall proceed to a <br /> hearing and determination of those matters subject to their consideration either immediately upon <br /> the date set for hearing, or may adjourn such hearing from time to time as they shall see fit, but <br /> not exceeding two weeks. During such time consumed by adjournment, the state engineer may <br /> file such additional or supplemental reports as he sees fit, and they shall also be considered in the <br /> determination. <br /> Source: L. 21: p. 519, § 4. C.L. § 2060. CSA: C. 90, § 435. CRS 53: § 149-2-4. C.R.S. 1963: § <br /> 150-2-4. <br /> C.J.S. See 94 C.J.S., Waters, § § 319(2),321. <br /> 37-42-105. Adverse report - investigations. (1) In case the report of the state engineer is <br /> adverse to the formation of such district because it is not considered feasible, he shall state his <br /> reasons for such conclusion in concise language and shall call attention thereto expressly in his <br /> letter transmitting such report to the board of county commissioners. The board of county <br /> commissioners shall thereupon fix and determine, upon such investigations and hearings as they <br /> see fit, the following matters and things: <br /> (a) Whether the statutory requirements preliminary to organization have been substantially <br /> complied with, which determination shall be reviewable only by an action in the nature of <br /> certiorari issuing out of the district court having jurisdiction and upon application therefor made <br /> within fifteen days of the date of determination by the board of county commissioners; <br /> (b) Fix the territorial extent and boundaries of such district and, in so doing, consider the <br /> petition upon which hearing is had, together with such petitions for inclusion within or exclusion <br /> from said district as are presented. <br /> (2) No lands shall be excluded from said district which are susceptible of irrigation from the <br /> source of water supply intended for the irrigation of the district and not more easily irrigable <br /> from another source, nor shall any lands be included within said district which are not susceptible <br /> of irrigation from the source of supply intended for the district, or which are already irrigated, or <br /> which can be more easily irrigated from another source. <br /> (3) Objection to such exclusions or inclusions, or the order fixing the territorial extent and <br /> boundaries of the district, shall be made in writing by the interested landowners, on or before <br /> such date of hearing or adjournment thereof, and an appeal from such adverse determination <br /> prosecuted to the district court of the county wherein such hearing is had, as in the case of <br /> appeals from disallowance of claims, insofar as applicable, within fifteen days from such <br /> determination. No such appeal having been prosecuted, the determination of the board of county <br /> commissioners shall be deemed conclusive on such points. <br /> Source: L. 21: p. 519, § 5. C.L. § 2061. CSA: C. 90, § 436. CRS 53: § 149-2-5. C.R.S. 1963: § <br /> 150-2-5. <br /> C.J.S. See 94 C.J.S., Waters, § § 319(2),321. <br /> 37-42-106. Notice of organization meeting and election. (1) Immediately following the <br /> determination of the board of county commissioners, it shall call an organization meeting and <br /> election of such proposed irrigation district for the purpose of determining whether such <br /> irrigation district shall be organized, and if organized, for the election of officers. Notice of such <br /> meeting shall recite the name of the proposed irrigation district, shall describe the boundaries <br /> thereof as defined by the determination of the board of county commissioners, and shall state that <br /> the purposes of such meeting are to determine whether said district shall be organized and, if <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.