Laserfiche WebLink
When a man's environment has been one of practical cleanliness <br />he lives longer, produces more, and his enjoyment of living is greatly <br />increased, This intangible benefit is one which cannot be neglected <br />from either an economic or social viewpoint. <br />POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES II' EMCT <br />Water pollution control agencies of Basin States have, in general, <br />good records. 11 nicipalities and industries in these States have shown <br />a spirit of cooperativeness and an understanding of pollution control- <br />needs by installing numerous waste treatment plants. <br />Programs for training sewage plant operators have been developed <br />by the State control agencies including consultative visits to sewage <br />plants. The agencies have also familiarized the public regarding the <br />effects of pollution and the needs for new or improved treatment plants. <br />The State health agencies exercise control over the construction of muni® <br />cipal and industrial treatment works by requiring that plans and specifi- <br />cations for sewage treatment structures be submitted for approval. This <br />requirement has protected the interests of the public and has generally <br />resulted in municipal waste treatment works. The effects of pollution <br />have been discussed with many local groups, Operators of sewage treat- <br />ment works have been kept informed concerning new methods of treatment. <br />A large measure of present control can be attributed to the public health <br />educational program instituted by the State agencies. <br />The State pollution control agencies plan regular visits to sew- <br />age treatment works, at which time the plants are inspected and reports <br />of their condition prepared for submission to municipal officials. Plant <br />inspections are supplemented by occasional stream investigations in order <br />to determine effects of contributed pollution on the biochemical and bio- <br />logical characteristics of the streams. <br />Sewage treatment works can be credited with removing about /.,6 per-- <br />cent of the municipal pollution of the Basins I%lunicipal `treatment con- <br />sists of the following: 16 primary treatment w {arks serving about 538,650 <br />people; 27 secondary treatment plants for about 149,240 people. Si.Vteen <br />municipalities with a population of 19,430 (table 7) provide no treatment„ <br />Adequacy of municipal and industrial treatment facilities .is Listed <br />in table 9. Progress in pollution abatement is shown in table 10. From <br />1946 to 1952, nine municipal plants and no industrial plants were com- <br />pleted. <br />The tremendous amount of waste from the sugar refining industry <br />during the months of October, November, December and January is virtu- <br />ally untreated. However, this problem is now under study by the Great <br />Western Sugar Company. The oil refineries have oil separators at each <br />of the six plants. Dine of the 13 meat packing or slaughtering houses <br />have some degree of treatment; 3 of the 3 canneries and 1 of the 3 <br />dairies provide treatment; the malted milk plant and the brewery are in <br />the process of constructing a new treatment plant as a joint operation, <br />31 <br />