My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150319 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
C150319 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2014 4:01:02 PM
Creation date
2/26/2014 11:41:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150319
CT2015-043
Contractor Name
Fisher Ditch Company
Contract Type
Loan
County
Denver
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Feasibility Study for Various Infrastructure Improvements <br />Fisher Ditch Company <br />Executive Summary <br />The Fisher Ditch is operated by the Fisher Ditch Company, which is responsible for diverting and <br />delivering water from Clear Creek to shareholders along the ditch and appurtenant laterals. The <br />Fisher Ditch Company (Fisher) has identified a number of critical infrastructure projects along the <br />ditch which need to be addressed to maintain reliable water yields and deliveries to shareholders <br />while maintaining affordable share assessments. The projects identified herein are intended to <br />address aging/failing infrastructure and operatio ns/maintenance issues along the ditch. <br /> <br />Fisher currently (and historically) derives the majo rity of its operating revenue from shareholders <br />via share assessments. Other minor revenue sources include interest on savings accounts, <br />crossing agreements, and other sources. Financia l reports for fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011 <br />year-to-date are summarized in Table 1. Complete reports are provided in Appendix C. <br /> <br />There are four separate projec ts to repair aging/failing infras tructure contemplated in this <br />application (Figure 2). The projects are listed in order of importance to the continued efficient, <br />reliable, and safe functioning of the ditch syst em. This feasibility study evaluated three <br />alternatives for each project, with the basic parameters summarized below. <br /> <br /> lte A <br /> <br /> nativ <br /> <br /> nativ <br /> <br /> <br /> nativ <br />rnative Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 Notes <br />Altere 1 <br />No Action <br />$0 <br />No Action <br />$0 <br />No Action <br />$0 <br />No Action <br />$0 <br />Anticipated to result in <br />infrastructure failure and/or <br />company liability <br />Altere 2 <br />New gate, hoist and <br />actuator <br />$57,500 <br />New 36-inch PE pipeline <br />$127,680 <br />Rehab. existing spillway <br />$56,875 <br />Fencing along top of slope <br />$73,125 <br />Alternative infeasible or <br />more expensive than <br />preferred alternative <br />Altere 3 <br />Rehabilitate gate <br />$14,950 <br />New 38-inch X 24-inch <br />RCPE pipeline <br />$142,440 <br />New sand-out, gates and <br />outlet pipe <br />$105,625 <br />New 1500-foot 48-inch PE <br />pipeline <br />$242,125 <br />Preferred alternatives <br />address issues while <br />providing most value to <br />shareholders <br /> <br />The preferred alternative for all projects is one that the Fisher believes addresses the underlying <br />infrastructure or maintenance concern while provid ing the most value to the ditch company. Cost <br />opinions for the preferred alternatives for each project are summarized below. <br /> <br /> <br />Project ID Total Cost ($)Loan Amount ($) <br />Project 1 - Headgate rehabilitation $14,950 $13,455 <br />Project 2 - Broadway piping $142,440$128,196 <br />Project 3 - Sand-out gate $105,625 $95,063 <br />Project 4 - Federal piping $242,125$217,913 <br />Tota l $505,140$454,62 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A conservative financial analysis has been prepared to show the projected revenue and <br />expenses for the company over the loan period (A ppendix D). This analysis demonstrates that <br />Fisher Ditch shareholders can repay the anticipated loan through reasonable special <br />assessments. <br /> <br />The projects identified by Fisher Ditch as a part of this loan application are necessary to ensure <br />the continued reliable delivery of the company ’s water rights, preservation of reasonable <br />operating and maintenance assessments, and safety of its system for users and others. The <br />projects proposed are reasonably priced and can be completed in a straight-forward, workman- <br />like manner by a qualified contractor. The Fisher Ditch company is in suitable financial condition <br />to responsibly accept the loan obligation sought in this application and will be able to repay the <br />loan without overburdening its shareholders. <br /> 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.