My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150315 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
C150315 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2014 11:24:21 AM
Creation date
2/26/2014 11:24:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150315
Contractor Name
Snowmass Water & Sanitation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
38
County
Pitkin
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
both locations. The monthly correlation factors in conjunction with the Roaring Fork <br />above Aspen flow records were used to estimate flows at the Snowmass Creek Pump <br />Station. Upstream diversions for the period of interest were added to the Snowmass <br />Creek Pump Station to obtain an estimate of the virgin flow for Snowmass Creek. The <br />synthetic (correlated) period of streamflow record was April 2002 through October 2002. <br />Downstream Tributary Inflow. Tributary inflow to Snowmass Creek, <br />downstream from the District's Snowmass Creek Pump Station, was accounted for in the <br />model at three major tributaries: Hunter Creek, Wildcat Creek and Capital Creek. <br />Tributary inflow values were estimated based on a percentage of Snowmass Creek <br />virgin stream flows. The inflow from Hunter Creek and Wildcat Creek is based on a <br />correlation of tributary area and mean basin elevation verses monthly stream flow at <br />gages in the Roaring Fork basin. Inflow from Capital Creek was assumed equal to the <br />calculated streamflow in Snowmass Creek at the junction of the two streams, which is <br />believed adequate for modeling the short, lower reach of Snowmass Creek below <br />Capital Creek and above the Roaring Fork River. <br />Water Rights. The District's and other Snowmass Creek water rights that divert <br />from East Snowmass Creek and Snowmass Creek were explicitly modeled. Only non- <br />District water rights with an absolute decreed rate of 1.0 cfs or more were considered in <br />the model, i.e., smaller stock water use and domestic water rights were not modeled. <br />The District's Brush Creek water rights (rights that divert from Brush Creek, West Fork <br />Brush Creek and East Fork Brush Creek) were considered in a more general way under <br />the assumption that in a dry year very little water would be available under those rights. <br />The impact of the Brush Creek rights is accounted for in the Demand Side model. <br />In-Stream Flow Rights. The minimum in-stream flow right for Snowmass <br />Creek, between the confluence with West Snowmass Creek and the confluence with <br />Capital Creek, for the critical October 16 through March 31S period, is a variable rate <br />dependent upon the stream flow recurrence interval during an indicator stream flow <br />period of October 11 through October 15 During 1977 the average daily stream flow <br />during the indicator period was less than 19-cfs, and therefore, in accordance with the in- <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.