Laserfiche WebLink
The very nature of our governmental structure,, the federation of <br />forty -eight sovereign states and the preservation of the principles <br />guaranteed by federal and state constitutions in the light of present <br />day large scale irrigation expansion, present many questions respecting <br />"the right of use" of water of the natural streams of the arid and semi. <br />arid west, The states where irrigation is practised claim the right to <br />control the distribution of water among users within the state without <br />interference from the federal government or other states, but subject to <br />equitable apportionment among states on an interstate stream and the <br />power of Congress over interstate commerce and navigation. <br />Controversies involving waters of an interstate stream may be ad- <br />justed by original s -uits in the Supreme Court of the United States, action <br />in the lower federal courts subject to review by the Supreme Court of the <br />United States, or by compacts and treaties between states. The latter <br />method involves also coordinated efforts on the part of state officials <br />to devise plans of comprehensive development,. <br />The principles controlling the rights to water of interstate streams <br />have been well established through decisions of the Supreme Court of the <br />United States. The question of paramount importance today arises out of <br />attempts by the federal government to control these interstate waters„ <br />This we shall discuss later in the paper, First, may we note a few of <br />the outstanding principles which have to do with the division of water <br />between the states. These are very well summarized in the report of <br />American Society of Civil Engineers on "Interstate Water Problems" as <br />follows: <br />•.2,. <br />