My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150094 Phase I Report
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
C150094 Phase I Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2014 4:24:41 PM
Creation date
2/19/2014 3:15:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150094
Contractor Name
La Plata Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
County
La Plata
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Long Hollow Dam and Reservoir Phase I Summary Report <br /> used in the dam embankment upstream zone. Energy dissipation structures would be constructed <br /> at the end of the dam outlet works and at the discharge point of the spillway channel. <br /> Long Hollow dam and reservoir, with a capacity of 5,400 AF, as presented in Table 6,would cost <br /> $19.6 million (+1-50%). The $19.6 million cost for 5,400 AF equates to about $3,600 per AF. <br /> The total cost of the reservoir project will be influenced by the magnitude of the peak rate of flow <br /> in Long Hollow and the volume of the design flood. <br /> As stated in Section 8.2, financing for the design and construction of LHR is anticipated to be <br /> provided by the Authority from its La Plata River Future Projects Escrow Account. LPWCD <br /> would request funding from the Authority if the CWCB Phase II feasibility work is completed, <br /> after a more refined dam and reservoir size and design are determined, and after a refined opinion <br /> of cost has been prepared. Earth-rock fill configurations will be refined and spillway design- <br /> flood management will be optimized in the Phase II effort. LPWCD understands that the <br /> Authority requires the submission of a project proposal, as specified in the Future Projects <br /> Escrow Agreement, and that the Authority Board has discretion regarding approval of any <br /> proposal. <br /> 9.0 SUMMARY OF FEASIBILITY STUDY FINDINGS <br /> Key findings of this feasibility study include: <br /> 1. H-P's feasibility-level engineering geology study at the site reported that no geologic <br /> conditions that would make LHR technically infeasible were indicated. <br /> 2. A Section 404 Permit likely can be obtained with a reasonable amount of additional study <br /> and consultation. If the project has the potential to cause significant environmental <br /> impacts, an EIS may be needed. Threshold issues, such as minimization of impacts to the <br /> waters of the U.S., an acceptable Section 404 mitigation plan, mitigation for impacts to <br /> two prehistoric archaeological sites, and a non jeopardy finding for T&E species <br /> protected by the ESA are resolvable. Based on LPWCD discussions with CDOW and <br /> technical data evaluation by CDOW, the native fishery in the lower La Plata River can be <br /> 991-077.115 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 21 <br /> July 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.