My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 1:38:58 PM
Creation date
2/14/2014 2:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Report for a study on commercial peat extraction in Colorado, and the characteristics of Colorado Peat.
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/1/1990
Author
Stevens, Josephy; Doerfer, John; Humphries, Bruce
Title
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of the flowering takes place. Sites found to contain protected <br />species as defined by the Federal Endangered Species Act (PL 93- <br />205, 1973), or the State's Natural Heritage Program should not be <br />excavated as this would certainly threaten their survival and may <br />violate federal or state law. Close coordination of these <br />efforts with those of the state's Natural Heritage Program may <br />prove helpful. <br />Second, to protect the quality and quantity of surface <br />waters and ground waters during and after the period of <br />excavation, the same mitigation measures as are required under <br />the existing Mineral Rules should be applied. This may include <br />the diversion of upland runoff and surface streams around the <br />excavation area, the construction of drop structures at grade <br />changes, placement of riprap where needed to reduce erosion and <br />scour, the control of runoff from material storage and waste <br />piles, and possibly the construction of small settling ponds to <br />remove sediments from the watercourse, or other measures which <br />could protect water quality. Initially, the Division may wish to <br />consider a water monitoring requirement to ensure that additional <br />measures are not needed. <br />Third, clearing, excavating, and reclaiming should be done <br />incrementally and proceed across the area in unison. The area of <br />cleared land should never be larger than what is necessary to <br />excavate the amount of peat needed at that time. The vegetation <br />cleared at the outset of excavation should be stored as rooting <br />stock to be distributed over the area after excavation. This <br />0 67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.