My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 1:38:58 PM
Creation date
2/14/2014 2:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Report for a study on commercial peat extraction in Colorado, and the characteristics of Colorado Peat.
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/1/1990
Author
Stevens, Josephy; Doerfer, John; Humphries, Bruce
Title
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
$20.37 per cu.yd.. <br />through Front Range <br />Prices paid to <br />cases and establish, <br />If one assumes <br />These prices are for bulk peat sold mostly <br />nurseries. <br />land owners by operators were noted in two <br />ad a range from $0.75 to $2.00 per cu.yd.. <br />that the net value to the producers of both <br />bulk and packaged peat is approximately the same then the value <br />of all peat sold within the state would be about $20.00 per <br />cu.yd.. When multiplied by the annual excavation rate of 100,000 <br />cu.yds. it is estimated that peat industry revenues total around <br />$2 million annually. <br />Over the short term, variability in peat industry revenues <br />is directly related to activity in the building industry. Growth <br />in the building industry results in a higher demand for <br />landscaping, which in turn results in a higher demand for peat. <br />Over the long term, variability in the peat industry is probably <br />a function of regional population levels. The Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources (MDNR 1979) estimated that the <br />potential for long term growth in the horticultural segment of <br />Minnesota's peat industry was limited by "low per- capita use <br />levels and high transportation costs ". It could be assumed that <br />use levels in Colorado would be similar to those in Minnesota, <br />but that transportation charges would be higher due to the <br />mountainous terrain. The Minnesota study also found that even at <br />full expansion, capital expenditures and full -time employment <br />related to production and distribution would be small. <br />• 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.