My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 1:38:58 PM
Creation date
2/14/2014 2:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Report for a study on commercial peat extraction in Colorado, and the characteristics of Colorado Peat.
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/1/1990
Author
Stevens, Josephy; Doerfer, John; Humphries, Bruce
Title
A Characterization of the Status and Impacts of Peat Excavation in the State of Colorado February 1990
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
peatmoss, which indicates a specific type of originating <br />material. The term peatmoss, for example, is often used <br />erroneously to describe any peat soil. <br />Several peat operators interviewed noted that Colorado peat <br />is a marginal product in relation to the sphagnum's imported from <br />other states and Canada. One operator also noted that the <br />existence of two firms which make and sell a soil conditioner <br />made from composted organic wastes is further indication of the <br />marginal quality of Colorado peat soils. In reality, the <br />useability of the resource is probably more a function of the <br />quality of the deposits that the operators are excavating at any <br />one time, rather than the nature of the entire resource within <br />the state. Despite this, the peat resource is valuable when <br />extracted as noted by its continued use and sale. <br />The analysis of soil samples collected during the study was <br />completed as a compliment to the water sampling that was also <br />conducted. The results of the analysis are provided in Appendix <br />C. A review of the results of that analysis, indicated a <br />potential range of organic matter contents from a low of 21.4 <br />percent, to a high of 83 percent, with a mean of 52.9 percent. <br />It was hoped that analysis of bulk density differences existing <br />in excavated and unexcavated sites would give some explanation as <br />to the poor revegetation rate found in most excavated areas. <br />Unfortunately, however, because of errors in the procedure used <br />by the lab to calculate bulk density the figures provided cannot <br />be considered reliable and should be disregarded. <br />32 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.