Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Deere& Ault Consultants, Inc. (D&A)has prepared this Inundation Mapping Report at the request <br /> of the Highland Ditch Company. This report documents the procedure of modeling a clear-day dam <br /> breach of Highland No. 3 Dam, and the development of the resulting inundation maps downstream <br /> of the dam. The inundation maps will be used to update the existing Emergency Action Plan(EAP) <br /> and to assist those involved with emergency preparedness planning and response. The hydraulic <br /> models and inundation maps contained in this report were prepared using the NAVD 88 vertical <br /> datum. The report and all associated models have been prepared in accordance with the regulations <br /> and guidelines set forth by the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Office of the State <br /> Engineer(SEO). <br /> 1.1 Location and Background <br /> Highland Reservoir No. 3, also known as Foster Reservoir, is located approximately four miles east <br /> of Longmont, Colorado in Section 27 of Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal <br /> Meridian. It sits a third of a mile south of Highway 66 just west of I-25. The Highland Reservoir <br /> No. 3 Dam is classified as a Small Significant Hazard Dam, per the Rules and Regulations for Dam <br /> Safety and Dam Construction of the State of Colorado. It is an earthen compacted dam with a height <br /> of 18 feet above the outlet channel invert and a normal storage of approximately 1,670 acre-feet. A <br /> concrete wall which is meant to increase freeboard extends across the entire length of the dam crest. <br /> This wall was ignored in the breach analysis contained in this report because the spillway crest <br /> elevation is below the top of the earthen embankment. <br /> 2.0 DAM BREACH ANALYSIS <br /> 2.1 Breach Parameter Estimation <br /> Highland No. 3 Dam was visually inspected on-site and with aerial photographs, and a ground <br /> survey was conducted by D&A to determine the spillway crest elevation, the dimensions of the dam <br /> at the maximum section, and the dimensions of the outlet channel. <br /> Two failure scenarios were evaluated for the Highland No. 3 Dam: 1) A ground-level breach <br /> occurring at the dam's maximum section, and 2) a breach along the outlet structure and into the <br /> outlet channel. For the second alternative the breach was assumed to extend to the outlet channel <br /> invert,but the width of the breach was constrained to the dimensions of the channel. <br /> For the ground-level failure scenario three empirical methods for predicting the average breach <br /> width and failure time were compared. The methods, which are included in Appendix A, are the <br /> Froehlich (2008) equations, the Von Thun and Gillette(1990) equations, and the USBR (1988) <br /> equations (collectively referred to as the "empirical equations"),I The empirical equations predict <br /> the average breach width and failure time as a function of depth of water, dam height, and volume <br /> of water stored. For the outlet structure failure scenario the same three empirical methods were used <br /> A fourth empirical method known as the MacDonald&Langridge-Monopolis/Washington State(2007) <br /> method was not considered based on recommendations found in the Guidelines for Dam Breach Analysis. <br /> HIGHLAND No.3 DAM - 1 - June 15,2012 <br /> INUNDATION MAPPING REPORT <br />