Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1. Fuchs Reservoir Dam Failure <br /> Comparison of Dam Breach Parameters <br /> Empirical Method Average Breach Width Time of Failure <br /> (ft) (min) <br /> Froehlich 54 26 <br /> MLM-WA 41 34 <br /> 2.2 Dam Breach Simulation in HEC-HMS <br /> The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)hydrologic modeling computer program HEC-HMS <br /> was used to simulate a clear-day piping failure of Fuchs Dam using the breach parameters estimated <br /> by each of the empirical equations. As a conservative measure, the simulation which produced the <br /> greatest peak outflow was selected for use in the downstream hydraulic modeling and inundation <br /> mapping. <br /> For each HEC-HMS breach simulation the water surface was set at the service spillway crest <br /> (elevation 202.2 feet) at the onset of the breach, and the reservoir was assumed to drain completely. <br /> The assumption was made that the breach would extend from the dam crest (elevation 207.0 feet)to <br /> the elevation of the upstream invert of the outlet pipe (elevation 184.4 feet). The breach side slopes <br /> were set at 0.7:1 (horizontal to vertical) for the Froehlich (2008) simulation, and 1:1 for the MLM- <br /> WA (2007) simulation. As recommended in the Guidelines for Dam Breach Analysis,the piping <br /> failure was set to start at the midpoint of the final breach height, and both linear and sine wave <br /> progressions were tested. A capacity table provided by the SEO dated September 21, 1955 was used <br /> to model the reservoir storage. A copy of the capacity table is attached in Appendix B. The time to <br /> peak and the peak outflow for each of the HEC-HMS simulations is summarized below in Table 2. <br /> Table 2. Fuchs Reservoir Dam Failure <br /> Comparison of HEC-HMS Piping Simulation Results <br /> Linear Progression Sine Wave Progression <br /> Empirical Method Time to Peak Peak(cfs) Time to Peak Peak(cfs) <br /> Outflow(min) Outflow(min) <br /> Froehlich 26 6,600 21 6,200 <br /> MLM-WA 34 4,800 28 4,400 <br /> Of the methods that were analyzed,the Froehlich method with a linear breach progression resulted <br /> in the greatest predicted peak outflow of 6,600 cfs with a time to peak of 26 minutes. This <br /> hydrograph was routed downstream using HEC-HMS through representative reaches using the <br /> Muskingum-Cunge method. The reach descriptions, routing times, and predicted flow rates are <br /> summarized below in Table 3. The HEC-HMS output is attached in Appendix C, and the full <br /> HEC-HMS model is included on the Project CD. <br /> The elevations shown in this section of the report are relative to the vertical datum used in the 1985 <br /> Hydro-Triad drawings and the 2010 Davis Engineering survey. <br /> FUCHS DAM - 2 - June 15,2012 <br /> INUNDATION MAPPING REPORT <br />