Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SANTA MARIA DAM - 3 - July 11, 2013 <br />INUNDATION MAPPING REPORT <br />The MLM-WA method resulted in a predicted bottom breach width of 245 feet, an average breach <br />width of 425 feet, and a formation time of 3.53 hours. The “Results Check” section of the MLM- <br />WA spreadsheet also predicted that the erosion rate calculated by the equations was slower that <br />what can be reasonably expected. For this reason, the breach parameters predicted by the MLM- <br />WA method were not considered for use in the breach simulation of Santa Maria Dam. <br /> <br />2.2 Dam Breach Simulation in HEC-HMS <br /> <br />The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) hydrologic modeling computer program HEC-HMS <br />was used to simulate a clear-day piping failure of Santa Maria Dam using the breach parameters <br />estimated by the Froehlich empirical equations. For the HEC-HMS simulation the water surface <br />was set at the emergency spillway crest (gage height 93 feet) at the onset of the breach. The <br />assumption was made that the breach would extend from the dam crest (gage height 101 feet) to the <br />natural ground elevation (gage height 11 feet), and all water stored above the breach invert was <br />assumed to drain completely. The (constrained) breach bottom width was entered as 175 feet and <br />the breach side slopes were set to 1.316:1 (horizontal:vertical) in order to model the average breach <br />width of 293 feet. These breach dimensions are illustrated on the Typical Sections sheet in <br />Appendix A. As recommended in the Guidelines for Dam Breach Analysis the piping failure was <br />set to start at the midpoint of the final breach height, and both linear and sine wave breach <br />progressions were simulated. The SEO elevation-capacity table was used to model the reservoir <br />storage. The dam breach parameters and resulting peak outflows are summarized in Table 2. <br /> <br /> <br />Table 2. Santa Maria Reservoir Dam Failure <br />Comparison of Dam Breach Parameters and Peak Outflows <br /> Linear Progression Sine Wave Progression <br /> <br />Water <br />Height* <br />(ft) <br />Dam <br />Height* <br />(ft) <br />Vol. of <br />Water* <br />(ac-ft) <br />Ave. <br />Breach <br />Width <br />(ft) <br />Breach <br />Development <br />Time <br />Time to Peak <br />Outflow <br />Peak <br />(cfs) <br />Time to Peak <br />Outflow <br />Peak <br />(cfs) <br />Froehlich 82 90 40,210 293 1 hr 26 min 1 hr 26 min 298,400 1 hr 5 min 276,900 <br />*Height of water, height of dam, and volume of water are measured relative to the breach invert elevation. <br /> <br /> <br />The linear breach progression resulted in the greatest predicted peak outflow of 298,400 cfs with a <br />time to peak of 86 minutes. This hydrograph was routed downstream through representative <br />reaches using the Muskingum-Cunge method in HEC-HMS. A trapezoidal channel with 1:1 side <br />slopes was assumed. The reach lengths, Manning’s n-values, and bottom width input parameters <br />for the Muskingum-Cunge method were estimated in ArcMap using aerial photos, and the <br />elevations used to compute the routing reach slopes were taken from the USGS 10-meter digital <br />elevation model (DEM). The Manning’s n-values and bottom widths were calibrated and fine- <br />tuned through several iterations between this HEC-HMS model and a steady-state HEC-RAS model <br />of the routing reaches. The reach descriptions, routing times, and predicted flow rates are <br />summarized in Table 3. The HEC-HMS output is attached in Appendix D, and the full HEC-HMS <br />model is included on the Project CD. <br /> <br />