My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1400000062 Droz Creek Inundation Report
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
1400000062 Droz Creek Inundation Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2014 3:04:57 PM
Creation date
2/5/2014 12:02:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
14000000062
Contractor Name
Droz Creek Dam
Contract Type
Grant
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Droz Creek Reservoir Breach Inundation Report | Flood Routing 3 <br /> <br />FLOOD ROUTING <br />The second task of this analysis was to route the dam breach discharge hydrograph downstream <br />until the attenuated breach flow rate was lower than the 100-year flow rate, based on the FEMA <br />Flood Insurance Study (FEMA, 1987). The downstream reach included Poncha Creek and the South <br />Fork Arkansas River to just downstream of Poncha Springs. The modeled reach is approximately <br />eight miles in length. <br /> <br />Poncha Creek downstream of the Droz Creek Dam can be described as a mountain channel with an <br />average channel invert slope of approximately 3%. A model of the reach was generated in FLO-2D. <br />Base elevations were obtained from the Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) in the form of LiDAR <br />data. The LiDAR elevation data has a horizontal resolution of approximately 3 meters. <br /> <br />The grid element size was set to 25-ft for the FLO-2D model. Manning’s n-values for the channel <br />were established based on Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels, USGS. Water Supply <br />Paper 1849, Barnes, 1967. The channel overbanks were assigned a Manning’s N value ranging from <br />0.04 to 0.07 in order to reflect dense vegetation observed from 2011 NAIP aerial photos. Culverts <br />within the reach were not modeled assuming that in the worst case scenario they would be blocked <br />with debris. <br /> <br />The inflow for the model was set as the dam breach discharge hydrograph at the base of the lowest <br />of the four Smith Ponds. No base flow was considered in the model. The downstream control for the <br />model defaults to normal depth at the outlet cells using the projected slope from the adjacent <br />upstream cells. The hydraulic calculations were performed in FLO-2D Build No. 13.07.05 using <br />average time step intervals of 0.5 to 1.3 second computation intervals. <br /> <br />Upon routing the dam breach flood downstream, it was determined that the peak discharge <br />attenuates from approximately 7,300 cfs at the dam to approximately 1,370 cfs just downstream of <br />Poncha Springs, about 5.5 miles downstream of the dam. This flow is less than the predicted 100 <br />year flood in this reach of the South Fork Arkansas River (1,490 cfs). The FLO-2D model continues <br />downstream for about 2.5 additional miles which were not included in the inundation mapping <br />discussed below. <br /> <br />Depth and velocity results are tabulated on the inundation maps and apply to the grid element in <br />which the critical structure is located. <br /> <br />FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING <br />The third and final task of this analysis was to map the resulting breach flood inundation extents. <br /> <br />Critical locations were identified using 2011 imagery obtained from the National Agriculture <br />Imagery Program (NAIP). A structure was identified as being critical if it was located within the <br />flood extent or overtopped by the flood wave. A total of 31 critical structures were identified (See <br />Figure 1 for details on each structure analyzed). The resulting inundation map can be found in <br />Figure 1. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.