Laserfiche WebLink
State Water Laws, Policies, and Administration <br /> Provision was made for publication of notice that the tabulation had been made and <br /> mailing of the tabulations for each division, as well as for filing objections to the <br /> manner in which a water rights is listed in a tabulation, and for necessary or <br /> advisable revisions of the tabulations. These tabulations were to serve as the <br /> basis for preparation of another set of tabulations to be completed by July 1, <br /> 1974, and for successive revisions of the tabulations every four years thereafter. <br /> The 1974 and succeeding tabulations are to be filed in court for adjudication by <br /> the water judge for each division. After adjudication, any person who wishes may <br /> protest either omissions from the tabulation or the manner of inclusion of water <br /> rights therein. The water judge is then directed to enter a judgment and decree <br /> either incorporating the tabulation of the division engineer as filed,. or incorporating <br /> the tabulation with such modifications as the water judge may determine proper. <br /> Appellate review of the judgment and decree may be had as in other civil actions. <br /> In preparing the 1974 and successive tabulations, division engineers are <br /> directed to include priorities awarded subsequent to those listed in the preceding <br /> tabulations, to incorporate any changes of water rights that have been approved, <br /> to note any changes from conditional water right to water right, to modify any <br /> water rights which the division engineer determines to have been abandoned in <br /> part, and to omit any water rights which the division engineer determines to have <br /> been totally abandoned. Nonuse of a water right for ten years or more, "when <br /> needed by the person entitled to use same," creates a rebuttable presumption of <br /> abandonment. Division engineers are to prepare separate priority lists as <br /> necessary so that only those water rights taking water from the same source <br /> and which are in a position to affect one another will be on the same priority list. <br /> Rule of Priority <br /> The basic rule set forth in the State constitution is that between competing <br /> users of water, priority of appropriation gives the better right. Consequently, <br /> in time of shortage of water supply, the uses of persons whose appropriations <br /> are junior in date of initiation are curtailed to make water available to those <br /> whose appropriations are senior in time, and therefore, prior in right. <br /> The State officials who are charged with administration and distribution <br /> of water--the State Engineer, the division engineers, and the water commissioners-- <br /> are governed by the priorities for water rights established by judicial decrees <br /> entered in court adjudication proceedings for the determination of water rights. <br /> 2.4 <br />