Laserfiche WebLink
Introduction <br /> While the general adequacy of water supplies encouraged the enactment <br /> and adoption of liberal laws and policies during the early development periods, <br /> irrigation and industrial expansion, and population growth in later years have <br /> brought full utilization of surface water supplies in some areas. This situation <br /> has called for greater stringency in the administration of the water laws and <br /> policies in the State. Currently, mounting evidence indicates direct inter- <br /> relationships between occurrence and usage of surface and ground water. The <br /> evidence has prompted recent legislation to cope with problems or rights thereto <br /> and conflicts in surface and ground water usage and overall water right <br /> administration. <br /> While the constitution stipulates that the water of every natural stream is <br /> dedicated to the use of the people of the State, this stipulation is subject to the <br /> qualification inasmuch as decisions of the United States Supreme Court provide <br /> for equitable apportionment of the benefits arising from the flow of an interstate <br /> stream. Accordingly, Colorado may not use and control, as it sees fit, all of <br /> the water in many streams originating within its borders. The equitable rights <br /> of the lower states must be recognized, and a division of the water of all inter- <br /> state streams is required before the states can know the quantity each has for use. <br /> This division may be accomplished either by United States Supreme Court decree <br /> or by interstate compact consented to by the United States Congress. <br /> Colorado has by decree or compact defined its rights to the use of the <br /> water of every major interstate stream. There are compacts apportioning the <br /> flows of the South Platte River, the Republican River, the Rio Grande, Costilla <br /> Creek, the La Plata River, the Colorado River, and for the Upper Colorado River <br /> Basin. Supreme Court decrees are enforced for the apportionment of flows of <br /> the North Platte and Laramie Rivers. The Arkansas River flows are apportioned <br /> by two Supreme Court decrees and an interstate compact. <br /> ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> The preparation of this report has been made possible by the active <br /> cooperation and participation of the Colorado Water Conservation Board, the <br /> State Attorney General's Office, the State Engineer's Office, and the Colorado <br /> State Study Team. <br /> 1.4 <br />