Laserfiche WebLink
Ish Reservoir Company <br />October 18, 2013 (Updated October 21, 2013) <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Alternatives considered were: <br />Agenda Item 8g <br />Alternative 1— Do Nothing: This alternative is considered unacceptable. Without the structures, the <br />Company is unable to divert its water rights thereby leading to abandonment of the rights. <br />Alternative 2 — Rebuilding Collaboratively with Improvements: The replacement will be built in <br />collaboration with Boulder and Larimer County Irrigating and Manufacturing Company. Final <br />design alternatives are being evaluated. <br />Selected Alternative 3 — Repair of Both the Diversion Structure and Ish Reservoir Inlet: The scope <br />of work for the diversion structure repairs involves removing debris from the dam and inlet <br />structure, forming and pouring a new wing wall on the north side of the diversion dam, and then <br />rechanneling the Little Thompson River to flow back over the diversion dam. <br />The scope of work for inlet washout repairs involves creating a new path for the Company's ditch <br />through this area. This will involve creating a permanent foundation secured to bedrock and <br />building a new water conveyance system on top of this foundation. The decision on the type of <br />conveyance system will be determined based on an engineering analysis. The options include an <br />open ditch, a box culvert or pipe. The selection of the best option will be based on a feasibility <br />study and economical analysis. Significant weight will be given to the option that is most likely to <br />handle the next maj or flood event. Additionally, the headgates are full of silt and debris and the ditch <br />below the diversion dam has 8 —10 feet of silt and debris that must be removed. <br />The estimated engineering and construction cost of the Company's portion of the selected <br />alternative is $205,000. (Note: The Boulder and Larimer County Irrigating and Manufacturing <br />Company is also seeking an Emergency Loan from the CWCB to fund its portion of the project <br />costs.) <br />TABLE 2: PROJECT COST SUMMARY (COMPANY'S PORTION ONLY) <br />Task <br />Cost <br />Design & Permitting <br />$55,000 <br />Construction <br />$120,000 <br />Silt and Debris Removal <br />$30,000 <br />Total <br />$205,000 <br />Note: Contingencies were built into each task's estimates <br />Collaboration: The borrower is encouraged to consider rebuilding a river diversion system that <br />enhances consumptive and nonconsumptive uses of water within the river corridor. Examples <br />include improved fish passage, improved rafting/boating navigation, and possible shared <br />ownership /use of a single diversion structure where possible. If needed, loan funds may be used for <br />the construction of temporary diversion until such time that a multi - beneficial structure can be <br />designed and constructed. <br />