Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lamar Agenda Item29a <br />September 13, 2013 (Updated September 26, 2013) <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />The City has groundwater rights to 43 wells for use in the water supply system. Of these, 29 are <br />active wells used for potable use. Raw water from the wells is pumped to a chlorination building <br />and stored in above grade storage tanks. The remaining wells are scattered throughout the City for <br />irrigation of parks, for use at the City's maintenance shop, and for use at the airport. <br />Project Description <br />The existing South well field's main water transmission line is constructed of cast iron and is in <br />very poor condition. Recent sampling of the pipeline by the City Water Department and Honeywell <br />Building Solutions indicated a significant amount of scale build -up, pressure drop, and pin -hole <br />leaks. This sampling included water quality tests, pumping (energy) head loss testing, and removal <br />of a section of pipe for visual inspection. The condition of the pipe contributes to less than desired <br />water quality, excess pumping energy, serious risk for pipeline failures and water loss. It was <br />determined that replacement of this critical infrastructure pipeline is the only viable alternative, and <br />that implementation should proceed immediately. <br />Three alternatives were considered: <br />Selected Alternative 1- Replace Southern Transmission Line with Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe: <br />This alternative evaluated replacing the transmission line with 34,200 linear feet of PVC pipe to <br />conserve water and improve energy efficiency. Replacing the line with 16 -inch PVC offers superior <br />corrosion resistance, ease of installation, and is substantially cheaper than Ductile Iron Pipe. <br />Alternative 2 - Replace the Southern Transmission Line with Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP): This <br />alternative evaluated replacing the transmission line with DIP. The price DIP is more expensive <br />than PVC; therefore, this alternative was eliminated based on cost. <br />Alternative 3 — No Action: This alternative was not considered a viable option due to poor condition <br />of the existing transmission main. The hundreds of AF of lost water every year makes this project <br />the most urgent water improvement project for the City. The superior water quality also allows the <br />City to reduce water treatment costs by using more water from the South well field source. <br />TABLE 1: TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY <br />Task <br />Cost <br />Pipeline Construction <br />$1,360,500 <br />Final Design and Construction Management <br />$369,300 <br />Permitting <br />$13,600 <br />Contingency <br />$226,600 <br />Total <br />$1,970,000 <br />Schedule: The Project schedule is as follows: bid the Project in November of 2013; construction in <br />the winter /spring of 2013/14. <br />