Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 2 <br />DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES <br />Table 2 -2 (continued) <br />Summary of Future Uses of M &I Water by Colorado Ute Tribes and Other Project Beneficiaries <br />Category of M &I Use <br />Diversion (afy) <br />Depletion (afy) <br />Other Binding Uses <br />Navajo Nation <br />4,680 <br />2,340 <br />ALPWCD <br />5,200 <br />2,600 <br />SJWC <br />20,800 <br />10,400 <br />Estimated Operational Losses <br />2,235 <br />2,235 <br />Total for Other Uses <br />32,915 <br />17,575 <br />Total Water Use <br />111,965 <br />57,100' <br />Source: Dombusch 1999; Riley 1999a; Bliesner 1999. <br />'In addition to the 57,100 afy depletion, the Colorado Ute Tribes are entitled to another 13,000 afy of depletion under the <br />Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Final Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement). These additional depletions could <br />come from the purchase of land and water rights and would follow a historical depletion pattern which would not result in any <br />additional depletions above the 57,100 afy.. <br />2.1.1.3.1 Rationale for Using a Fifty (50) Percent Depletion Factor For M &I Uses <br />The depletion amounts shown in Tables 2 -1 and 2 -2 reflect a 50 percent depletion factor for M &I uses. <br />Several factors were important in using depletion factors different than the numbers as stated in the <br />Settlement Act. <br />'• The irrigation component has been deleted from the ALP Project. <br />I• The projected M &I uses by the Colorado Ute Tribes are non - binding which makes it difficult to <br />accurately project the actual diversions and corresponding return flows. <br />I• The 50 percent depletion factor allows the Colorado Ute Tribes flexibility in the use of their <br />water. <br />I• The 50 percent depletion factor allows this FSEIS to analyze effects to the river systems that <br />could occur depending upon the eventual use of water. <br />• The overall effect on the total depletion to the San Juan River at a point located downstream of <br />1 both diversions and return flows is negligible. <br />IWith these considerations, a 50 percent depletion factor was considered to be appropriate. This is a <br />commonly accepted rule of thumb in M &I projects for determining the amount of return flows. <br />2.1.1.4 . Future Environmental Compliance <br />This FSEIS addresses the settings, likely impacts, and proposed mitigation measures for the structural <br />and non - structural components of the alternatives. While these aspects of the proposed structural <br />components are well defined, the non - structural components, as well as future water uses, are <br />projections. The specific uses to which a water acquisition fund may be put by the Colorado Ute Tribes <br />in implementing the non - structural components would be determined in the future. It may include <br />acquisition of land and associated water rights, or other activities appropriate to the use of this fund. The <br />range of impacts would vary depending on these future uses. Similarly, the future water use projections <br />2.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2-10 <br />