Laserfiche WebLink
List of Tables <br />xxv <br />Page No. <br />3.11 -1 <br />Average Monthly Distribution of Commercial Rafting Customers on the Animas <br />3.11 -2 <br />River ........ ........................... ..............................3 <br />Comparison of Existing Ridgway Reservoir Recreation Facilities and Possible <br />-175 <br />Recreation Facilities at Ridges Basin Reservoir ............................... <br />3 -177 <br />3.11 -3 <br />Rafting User -Days on the San Juan River between Bluff and Clay Hills, Utah ....... <br />3 -185 <br />3.11 -4 <br />Projected Losses in Commercial Rafting by Floatable Days and Rafting User -Days on <br />the Animas River under Refined Alternative 4 ................................. <br />3 -187 <br />3.11 -5 <br />Average Number of Days with Reduced River Miles Available for Commercial <br />Rafting or Take -Out Locations Downstream of 32nd Street under Refined <br />3.11 -6 <br />Alternative4 ............................ ............................... <br />San Juan River Near Bluff, Utah <br />3 -189 <br />3.12 -1 <br />............ ............................... <br />Base Case Value -Added Data for La Plata, Montezuma, and San Juan Counties ...... <br />3 -193 <br />3 -198 <br />3.12 -2 <br />Comparison of Retail Sales Sectors in La Plata County in 1997 ................... <br />3 -202 <br />3.12 -3 <br />Comparison of Retail Sales Sectors in Montezuma County (1997 ................. 3 -204 <br />3.12 -4 <br />Comparison of Retail Sales Sectors in San Juan County, New Mexico ............. 3 -206 <br />3.12 -5 <br />Economic Impacts for La Plata County Resulting from Construction of Structural <br />Facilities for Ridges Basin Reservoir ......... ............................... <br />3 -208 <br />3.12 -6 <br />Economic Impacts for La Plata County Resulting from Construction of the Navajo <br />3.12 -7 <br />Nation Municipal Pipeline ................. ............................... <br />Top 10 Industries Impacted, in San Juan County from Constructionof the Navajo <br />3 -209 <br />3.12 -8 <br />Nation Municipal Pipeline ................. ............................... <br />Estimated Construction Costs and Revenue Generation Resulting from Non - Binding <br />3 -209 <br />3.12 -9 <br />EndUses ........................ ............................... .3 <br />Economic Impacts for La Plata County for Construction of Structural Modifications <br />-211 <br />3.12 -10 <br />to Lemon Reservoir ..................................................... <br />Estimated Changes in Agricultural Revenues by County <br />3 -212 <br />3.13 -1 <br />........................ <br />Durango Planning Area Existing Land Uses ... ............................... <br />3 -212 <br />3 -220 <br />3.15 -1 <br />Assumptions Used in Identifying Construction- Related Traffic ImpactsAssociated <br />with the Structural Components of Refined Alternative 4 ........................ <br />3 -235 <br />3.15 -2 <br />Estimated Additional Ridges Basin Facilities Construction Peak Hour Commute <br />Trips at theIntersection of West Frontage Road and County Road 211 ............. <br />3 -239 <br />3.15 -3 <br />Estimated Additional Ridges Basin Facilities Construction Peak Hour Commute <br />Trips at the Intersection of U.S. 550/160 and West Frontage Road ................ <br />3 -240 <br />3.15 -4 <br />2020 Recreation Visitation Impacts on Wildcat Canyon Road (CR 141) ............ <br />3 -243 <br />3.16 -1 <br />Summary of Total Daily Construction Emissionsfrom Construction of Ridges <br />Basin Dam, Durango Pumping Plant, and Ridges Basin Inlet Conduit .............. <br />3 -250 <br />3.16 -2 <br />Summary of Total Daily Construction Emissionsfrom Construction of Navajo Nation <br />3.16 -3 <br />Municipal Pipeline ...................................................... <br />Summary of Total Daily Construction EmissionsFrom Enlargement of Lemon Dam <br />3 -250 <br />3 <br />3.17 -1 <br />.. <br />Permissible Noise Intensities from Stationary Sources in Durango and Farmington ... <br />-254 <br />3 -257 <br />3.17 -2 <br />Typical Construction Equipment Noise Intensities ............................. <br />3 -260 <br />3.21 -1 <br />Summary of Impacts for Refined Alternative 4 and Refined Alternative 6 ........... <br />3 -287 <br />4 -1 <br />Southern Ute Indian Tribal Lands ........................ <br />4 -20 <br />4 -2 <br />.. ........... <br />Ute Mountain Ute Lands <br />. <br />5 -1 <br />.................. .................... <br />Water Supply and Costs - Preferred Alternative <br />4 -20 <br />5 -2 <br />............ .. _ _ . 5 -8 <br />Total Costs for Preferred Alternative .......................................... 5 -9 <br />6 -1 <br />................ <br />Agencies and Organizations that Participated in the ALP Project Consultation and <br />7 -1 <br />Coordination Process .. ............................... . 6-4 <br />Federal, State and Local Permit Approval Consultation <br />and Requirements ............ <br />7 -5 <br />xxv <br />