Animas-La PLata Project Environmental Impact Statement

List of Tables
xxiii
Page No.
241
Alternative 9 Impacts to Environmental Resource Areas .........................
2 -71
242
Alternative 9 Evaluation of Capability of Alternative to Meet the Purpose and Need ...
2 -72
243
Alternative 9 Summary of Results of the Technical and Economic Factors ...........
2 -73
2-44
Alternative 10 Impacts to Environmental Resource Areas ........................
2 -75
2-45
Alternative 10 Evaluation of Capability to Meet Purpose and Need .................
2 -75
2-46
Alternative 10 Summary of Results of the Technical and Economic Factors ..........
2 -76
2-47
Summary of Significant Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives ................
2 -83
2-48
Summary of the Capability of Alternatives to Meet the Purpose and Need
2-49
Requirements............ .................. ...........................2 -85
Summary of Technical and Economic Factors ... ............................... 2 -89
2 -50
Refined Alternative 4 Structural and Non - Structural Components Depletions ......... 2 -97
2 -51
Refined Alternative 4 Summary of Water Sources and Amounts from Storage and
2 -52
Purchase of Water Rights ................... ............................... 2 -98
Water Supply by Use for the Structural Component of Refined Alternative 4 ......... 2 -99
2 -53
Total Costs Refined Alternative 4 ........... ...............................
2 -123
2 -54
Summary of Average Annual Operating Costs For Full Project Operation Ridges
Basin Dam and Reservoir, Durango Pumping Plant, and Ridges Basin Inlet Conduit ..
2 -126
2 -55
Summary of Annual Operating Navajo Nation Municipal Pipeline ................
2 -127
2 -56
Refined Alternative 6 Summary of Sources and Amounts of Water ................
2 -131
2 -57
Future Water Use and Average Diversion and Depletion Summary for Refined
Alternative 6 M &I Use at 50 Percent Efficiency ...............................
2 -132
2 -58
Capital Costs Refined Alternative 6 .......... ...............................
2 -145
2 -59
Comparison of Navajo Nation Municipal Pipeline Alternatives ...................
2 -154
2 -60
Alternative NNMP -1 Impacts to Environmental Resource Areas ..................
2 -155
2 -61
Alternative NNMP -1 Summary of Results of Technical and Economic Factors .......
2 -155
2 -62
Alternative NNMP -2 Impacts to Environmental Resource Areas ...................
2 -156
2 -63
Alternative NNMP -2 Summary of Results of Technical and Economic Factors .......
2 -157
2-64
NNMP -3 Impacts to Environmental Resource Areas ...........................
2 -158
2 -65
Alternative NNMP -3 Summary of Results of Technical and Economic Factors .......
2 -158
2 -66
Refined Alternative 4 and Refined Alternative 6 Future Water Uses and Acreage
2 -67
Affected............................ .. ..............................2
Refined Alternative 4 Approximation of Potential Acreage Impacted by Construction
-160
and Operation of Lateral Pipelines ........... ...............................
2 -161
2 -68
Refined Alternative 6 Acreage Impacted by Construction and Operation of
2 -69
Lateral Pipelines ......................... ...............................
Comparison of Refined Alternative 4 and Refined Alternative 6 ..................
2 -162
2 -168
3.1 -1
Agricultural Land Assumptions Associated with Land Acquisition Under the Non -
3.24
Structural Components ...................... ...............................
Summary of Future Without Project (Baseline) Depletions in the San Juan River Basin
3 -2
.. 3 -6
3.2 -2
Modeled Diversion and Depletion Summary for Refined Alternative 4 With All
M &I Use at 50 Percent Efficiency ............. ...............................
3 -8
3.2 -3
Modeled Diversion and Depletion Summary for Refined Alternative 6M &I Use at 50
3.2-4
Percent Efficiency .............................. .......................3
Mean, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Average Flow of the Animas River at Three
-15
Locations for Future Conditions with and without the Project ..................... 3 -21
3.2 -5
Mean Monthly Flows for the San Juan River at Four Corners, New Mexico
(USGS Gage) with Refined Alternative 4 and without (Baseline Condition) Project
for the Modeled Period 1929 -1993
........... ...............................
3 -24
xxiii