Laserfiche WebLink
A -LP Water Animas -La Plata Water Marketing Supply and Demand Study Section 3 <br />1. Pumping or releasing a quantity of water from Lake Nighthorse to the Animas River Exchange From <br />Point. <br />2. Diverting an equivalent quantity of water at the same time at the Exchange To Point if there is no <br />injury to senior water rights in the exchange reach between the Exchange From and Exchange To <br />Points. <br />3. The water must be used for a beneficial purpose at the Exchange To Point. <br />An exchange on the Animas River upstream of the DPP diversion is an obvious candidate for an <br />exchange; however, there is little unmet present or future municipal demand in this reach that could be <br />served by diversion from the Animas River (see Section 3.0). Furthermore the Durango RICD water right <br />(described in Legal Issues Section 4) constrains when and how A -LP Project water could be exchanged <br />upstream. As discussed in Item 2 of Section 4.2, Case No. 06 CW 127, Water Division 7 provides water <br />users upstream of the DPP with a way to obtain absolute decreed rights for uses in the future which will <br />be deemed senior to the Durango RICD. These senior rights should decrease the need to exchange <br />Project water upstream through this reach. Therefore, no viable market that could be served by <br />exchange of A -LP Project water upstream of the DPP has been identified. <br />There are two exchanges which are physically possible, but there may be limited interest. The first <br />exchange is with the Lake Durango Water Authority (LDWA) which presently diverts from the La Plata <br />River. Eventually, Lake Nighthorse water could be provided to the LDWA. When the facilities are availa- <br />ble, A -LP Project water could be exchanged into the La Plata basin by providing additional water to LDWA <br />and leaving water in the La Plata River. The LDWA La Plata diversions are not regulated; consequently <br />reservoir storage would be required in the La Plata River basin to provide a firm supply of augmentation <br />and /or domestic water. There is a major need for such water in the La Plata basin. <br />The second possible exchange involves the City of Durango's municipal diversion on the Florida River <br />approximately six miles downstream from Lemon Dam. The Florida River joins the Animas River in <br />Colorado approximately four miles north of the Colorado-New Mexico state line. Therefore, it is possible <br />to exchange from Lake Nighthorse to an Exchange To Point on the Florida River if there is municipal <br />demand at an Exchange To Point on the Florida River. State Water could be provided to the City from <br />Lake Nighthorse and the City could leave an equivalent amount of water in the Florida River. There is a <br />major need for instream flows during low flow periods in this reach of the Florida. Durango's Florida <br />River water, however, is available by gravity and is of generally higher quality than water from the Animas <br />River which requires pumping to reach Durango. <br />Another potential use for the State's A -LP Project water would occur if A -LP calls at Teft and the up- <br />stream junior rights to A -LP, but senior to RICD would be called out. This is primarily the Town of Silver - <br />ton and small uses in San Juan County where there were quite a few water rights applications filed to be <br />senior to RICD. If A -LP called, those rights could purchase Lake Nighthorse water which would enable <br />them to continue to divert. <br />Based on the SWSI (CWCB, 2007), there is future municipal demand in Colorado, if the State's A -LP <br />Project water could be exchanged or otherwise delivered into the Florida, La Plata, Dolores, San Juan <br />and /or Colorado River basins (see Figure 3.2.3. No. 1). With the exception of the Florida River, exchange <br />into any of these basins in Colorado would include a portion of the exchange reach in another state (New <br />Mexico, Arizona and /or Utah). It would not be possible for the Colorado State Engineer to administer an <br />exchange through another state without cooperation of downstream states. While such cooperation may <br />be possible, this type of agreement cannot be assumed within the scope of this study. Therefore, any <br />exchange of State Water to any Exchange To Points which include an exchange reach in another state is <br />limited. <br />3-4 <br />FINAL ALP Report-1_13 11_LL.dou <br />