Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 4 <br />OTHER IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS <br />4.6.4.3 impact Analysis <br />The following sections discuss potential impacts to ITAs and Environmental Justice of Refined <br />Alternatives 4 and 6 and the No Action Alternative. In addition, mitigation measures are proposed to <br />reduce or eliminate potential significant impacts. <br />4.6.4.3.1 Refined Alternative 4 <br />Indian Rust ets <br />Refined Alternative 4 Impact 1- Potentially Significant: Refined Alternative 4 does not meet the <br />terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement for the Colorado Ute Tribes. <br />Refined Alternative 4 would provide storage for a portion of the Colorado Ute Tribes' assured water <br />rights, However, the 39,960 afy of allowed depletion for the Colorado Ute Tribes is 13,240 afy less than <br />that identified in the Settlement Agreement. All water provided under Refined Alternative 4 must be <br />used for M&I purposes, while the Settlement Agreement specified that 3,400 afy of depletion be used for <br />irrigation purposes by the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, and 26,300 afy be used for irrigation purposes by <br />the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe. Because of the reduced amount of depletion, the lack of irrigation water <br />and facilities, the precise terms of the original Settlement Agreement would not be met under Refined % <br />Alternative 4. <br />Flowever, Refined Alternative 4 would provide the Colorado Ute Indian Tribes a means to purchase <br />approximately 13,000 afy through the use of a $40 million water acquisition fund. This amount could be <br />used to acquire private water rights on a willing buyer /willing seller basis. These funds could also be <br />redirected for on -farm development, water delivery infrastructure, or other economic development uses. <br />Most important, the Colorado Ute Tribes have endorsed Refined Alternative 4 as being sufficient % <br />substitute for the original elements of the 1986 Settlement Agreement. % <br />Mitigation for Refined Alternative 4 Impact is Seek modification of Settlement Agreement+ <br />Refined Alternative 4 would meet the Settlement Agreement ifCongress passes any legislation, with the % <br />support of the Colorado We Tribes, that specifies that the terms and conditions of Refined Alternative d % <br />satisfy the Colorado Ute Tribes' water rights. Both Colorado Ute Tribes have passed resolutions % <br />supporting the selection of Refined Alternative 4 for settlement of all their remaining water rights claims. % <br />Refined Alternative 4 Impact 2 - Significant! Under present conditions, Refined Alternative 4 <br />reduces the water supply available for the Jicarilla Apache Tribe water rights in the San Juan <br />River. <br />Relative to no action, Refined Alternative 4 reduces the present supply available to the Jicarilla Apache % <br />Tribe to allow utilization of its water rights consistent with the ESA. Section 7(a)(2) if the ESA states % <br />that each federal agency shall, in consultation with the Secretary, insure that any action authorized, % <br />funded, or carried out by that agency shall not jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species or % <br />result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat. For federal actions in the San Juan % <br />basin, such as ALIT, the Service has issued reasonable and prudent alternatives which have allowed the % <br />action to go forward. In the recent past, these RDA's have required Reclamation to participate in % <br />research to determine the flows needed to recover endangered fish species and then to operate Navajo % <br />Dam to mimic a natural hydrograph. Thus, according to current modeling, full implementation of the % <br />4,8 ENVIRUNMEN JAL JUSTICE AND <br />4 -23 INMAN TRUST ASSETS <br />