Laserfiche WebLink
This NRCS website, "Rate for Federal Water Projects," says the Treasury's annual certification of the interest rate for <br />2011 for federal water projects is 4.125 %. A table lists the annual rates going back to 1957. <br />4) A different federal website called "Treasury Direct" lists the certified annual rates by agency. <br />http : / /www.treasurydirect.gov /govt /rates /tcir /tcir fy2011 opdirannual.htm #table5. "Table 5- Bureau of <br />Reclamation" gives the FY 2011 rates for all BOR projects, pasted below. They vary depending on the <br />authorizing statute. The closest category for the A -LP Project is the second, referencing the Colo River Storage <br />Projects, which is the highest percentage rate, at 6.08 %. However, the 2000 Amendments reference only the <br />1956 Act, not the 1958 or 1965 Acts, so maybe you could argue that one of the lower rates should apply. (I <br />realize this is weak; I think A -LP is specifically mentioned in the Colo River Storage Project Act...) <br />Table 5 - Bureau of Reclamation <br />(Updated October 6, 20 10) <br />The following are the applicable rates for the fiscal year 2011 for computing interest on funds advanced for various Bureau of Reclamation activities. <br />Reclamation Rate <br />Activities <br />18 CFR 704.39 as required by Section 80(a), Public Law 93 -251 (88 Stat.34), Section 704.39(a) of the Water Resources Council's Rule and <br />Regulations (interest rate to be used for plan formation and evaluation); the unconstrained yield used for power repayment is 4.1620 %. 4 -1/8% <br />This rate does not include any adjustment that may be needed to show the maximum rate change of 1/4 of one percent per year. <br />Section 301(b) of the Water Supply Act of 1958, Public Law 85 -500, approved July 3, 1958, and Section 9 of Public Law 86 -529, approved <br />June 27, 1960, which amended Section 5(0 of Public Law 485, approved April 11, 1965, relating to the Colorado River Storage Project and 6.081% <br />participating projects (70 Stat. 109). <br />Section 202(3)(c) and Section 205(a)(3) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (Public Law 97 -293, Title II). 3.388% <br />Public Law 98 -569, (99 Stat. 2938), Section 205(4)(iv), approved October 30, 1984. Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act. 3 -3/4% <br />Section 104(a)(5) of the Hoover Dam Power of 1984 (43 U.S.C. 619). <br />3.7852% <br />Public Law 99 -546 requires a separate rate for the Central Valley Project (Public Law 99 -546, Section 106). 3 -3/4% <br />Public Law 95 -578, The Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978, and Public Law 98 -404, The Reclamation of Dams Act Amendments of <br />1984. <br />5) The Preliminary Project Cost Allocation in the A -LP Project's FSEIS, at Section 1.3, projected a 6 & 5/8 % IDC rate <br />as of 1998. That was based on the average interest rate payable to the Treasury for all outstanding marketable <br />U.S. securities which have terms of 15 or more years remaining to maturity (hey — this matches the Power <br />formula in FIN 06 -30 above) as of 1998. The next sentence says "IDC is converted to the appropriate repayment <br />rate for computing the repayment obligation. The actual repayment rate will be determined when construction <br />is initiated." <br />6) http: / /www.usbr.gov /uc/ envdocs /eis /navgallup /FEIS /vol2 /Appdx -C /Appdx- D- pt3.Pdf <br />The Navajo - Gallup IDC was projected at 4.75% as of 2007, using that Power formula, and the rate should only have <br />gone down further since then. <br />I am attaching SJWC's revised repayment contract, and note that their lawyer Liz Taylor would be a good co- consipirator <br />for keeping IDC down b/c she already negotiated their revised repayment contract and it looks as if the SJWC will have <br />to pay the same rate Colo does for IDC on any construction costs beyond the $6 million they already paid. <br />I hope this is helpful. I chatted with Casey about it so will copy her too. <br />Regards, <br />-Eve <br />