My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CWCB Repayment Contract ALP
CWCB
>
ALP Project
>
CWCB Repayment Contract ALP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2016 1:49:02 PM
Creation date
4/2/2013 2:38:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Animas La Plata Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
United Suites Departtrmit of the Interior <br />BUREAU OF 1113CLAtu,m1014 <br />Upper Cojorwlo Region <br />�'. western Coloi2do Araa Office <br />2764 Contl>.Za_ Drive, Suite lOG <br />935 E 21Ammt Suite 300 <br />Grand )unction CO 81506-8785 Doringo CO 81301 -5475 <br />AIT -100 JUN — 1 2006, <br />WCG- C:DeAragelis <br />W IR -4.00 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To. Cori tractors/Potcntial lepayment Sponsors <br />From: ]tick Fltat, Animas L;Anta <br />Carol DeAngelis, Western ('oiaracio Area Office Mitunf,Cr <br />Subject: Methodology Regarding Implementatiola of Section 207 on Up.-Front Cost - <br />Sttaring and Repayment, Animas -La Mata .Project <br />A. 13ackgrourtd. The passage of Sociion 207 of P.L. 108-447,,4,; amended, affects up- <br />fi-ont cost - staring and repayment of (lie Project. The statute provides: <br />S'ec- 207. Animas -La -Taro NOrt- Indian Sponsor Obligation v. In accordance with the <br />rlontribul rtpuylllenr obligation specified in .Subsuciion 6(a)(3)()_{1 of the Colorado Vie <br />Adian Righa Senlernent Act of 1988(Publir. Law 100 -585), as amended by the Colorado <br />Utc .Setlleiuer)t Act Amendments qf 2000 (Public La y 10(= .SSA!), the reimbursable cost <br />upm.) w1lich the Cost allocation shall be based shall not exceed $43, 000, 000, Plus interest <br />during construction for those parties not utilizing the up font paym etlt option, of the first <br />$500,000,000 (.7arlamary 2003 price level) o1'the total project costs. Consequently, the <br />Secretary,-nayforgive the obligation of the nor, - Indian- sponsors relative to the <br />S163,000,000 increase, and arty elects in ilr(lation thereon, in estimared total project <br />costs that occurred in 2003. <br />Tl> s docurilent is to record and acka)itsvledgo ceilain decisions blade by the Biwcau of <br />Reclarriation regarding impletnentatioll of the prevision cited ;above nfter consultation <br />with Al Project sponsors, including the Tribes. <br />B. Implementation Methodology. <br />1. Cost Allomation Method: The current contraris are based o» ihe.. 2001 luterim <br />Lost A llacation Method. This method will continue to be used for allocating costs. <br />2. Specific Costs and the Reimbursement Crap: The statutory language provides <br />that (he reimbursable costs shall not exceed $43 million for the first $500 million of total <br />project costs, thereby establishing a reimbiu-semcnt cap that covers boll) specific costs <br />and joint costs. 71erefore, the rei nbulsalile specific costs for ti,e C'it } of h)aranf;o shall <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.