Laserfiche WebLink
Board Meeting Minutes <br />August 16, 2012 <br />Page 5 <br />Authority's statute limits the use of Authority funds to planning, designing, and management of urgent <br />watershed protection and forest health projects. Mr. Brod and the Board discussed whether other sources <br />of funding were available that would not be as restricted as the Authority's fiends. Mr. Monson <br />understood that portions of the stabilization project could be considered as planning and designing,. Mary <br />Hammond rewrote Resolution No. 12 -62 to clarify the uses of the Authority funds by the CWCB to be <br />"planning, designing, and management of urgent watershed protection and forest health projects across <br />the state necessitated by the 2012 wildfires." A motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 12 -62 as <br />amended. <br />Motion by: Greg Higel <br />211d by: Greg Fisher <br />Vote: Motion carried 6 -0, Don Carlson recused himself from the vote. <br />Small Hydropower Loan Program <br />Status of Program — Ryan Shipley reported that no applications for SHLP Matching Grants had been <br />received since the August 16 °i Board meeting. There is $100,500 remaining for SHLP Matching Grants <br />in 2012, and two applications are anticipated in the near future. Two loans have been executed through <br />the program to date and staff continues to work with Tri- County Water and Sanitation District on its <br />project. A number of projects have been pushed back to wait for the outcome of pending legislation .to <br />eliminate the FERC permit requirement on projects of 5.0 kW or less. <br />Grant Assistance Program (GAP) for Small Svstems <br />Status of Program — Ryan Shipley reported that all allocated funds had been obligated. One Grant <br />Agreement had been executed since the previous Board meeting, and two additional closings had been <br />scheduled. The approval for all unexecuted grants will expire on February 16, 2013. <br />Water Revenue Bonds & Small Water Resources Projects <br />Status of Programs — Keith McLaughlin reported that staff was working with potential borrowers but it <br />was unlikely that any applications would be submitted during the remainder of 2012. The City of Aurora <br />was pursuing a partial prepayment of its WRBP 2005D Prairie Waters project, planned for November 7.. <br />2012, in an amount of approximately $41 million. Four SWRP borrowers had paid off their loans, <br />leaving only six borrowers in the program, two of which are also considering prepayments. Mr. <br />McLaughlin pointed out that the SWRP Program remaining principal balance had been halved in 2012, <br />from approximately $45 million to about $21 million. Staff had processed 15 prepayments under all <br />Authority programs this year as compared to a normal average of approximately one per year. <br />La Plata Future Projects Escrow & Animas -La Plata Project <br />Long Hollow Reservoir — Mike Brod showed construction photos of Long Hollow and stated that a winter <br />construction schedule is being finalized. In response to questions from the Board, Mr. Brod stated that to <br />date only one change order had been requested. An application for payment from the Resource Funds had <br />been filed and were waiting for approval by the Department of the Interior. <br />Animas -La Plata Project, Amendinent and Addendt.un to Schedule A — Annended and Restated Agreement <br />Between USDOI and the Authority, Resolution No. 12 -61 <br />Mike Brod stated that the previous Agreement for administering the Animas -La Plata Escrow Account <br />had expired on September 30, 2012, and that a draft amendment to the agreement to extend the term of <br />the agreement was included in the Board's materials. Mary Hammond stated that there had been some <br />discussion pertaining to use of the phrase "substantially complete" and the new amendment had been <br />written to extend the agreement for an indeterminate length of time. She also stated that an amendment <br />may not be acceptable to the Bureau of Reclamation because the original agreement had expired, thereby <br />necessitating a new agreement_ Resolution No. 12 -61 would approve execution of an amendment to the <br />expired agreement, substantially in the form submitted to the Board. Mr. Brod stated that he hoped to <br />