My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ALP 5
CWCB
>
ALP Project
>
ALP 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2016 1:49:03 PM
Creation date
3/28/2013 4:08:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Animas La Plata Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A. DPP and Inlet Conduit: 2-93150 cfs is the anticipated maximum pumping <br />capacity. The actual capacity will include the DPP and inlet conduit and pumping for the City of <br />Durango p mp pipeli ^^ and will be determined through t#e- testing of the facilities- laeā¬eFe <br />( "DPP Capacity "). <br />B. Ridges Basin Reservoir, a.k.a. Lake Nighthorse: <br />Active Storage 930'541WO af* <br />Inactive 30,000 of <br />Total Capacity 120-,GW3,541 of <br />The 2000 Amendments also provide that "If constructed, the facilities described in <br />subparagraph (A) shall constitute the Animas -La Plata Project." § 302(a)(1)(C). Absent further <br />congressional authorization, "other [P]roject features authorized by Public Law 90 -537 [i.e., the <br />act that authorized the Colorado River Basin Project] shall not be commenced." P.L. 106 -554 § <br />302(a)(1)(C)(i). <br />IV. SUMMARY OF THE COLORADO UTE TRIBES' DECREES CONFIRMING THEIR A -LP <br />ALLOCATIONS: <br />In 1976, the United States filed claims in the Division 7 Court, Case No. W- 1603 -76, <br />asserting federal reserved water rights on behalf of the Ute Tribes. The case was divided into <br />separate cases, each addressing claims on a different regional river. Rather than litigate their <br />claims, the Ute Tribes chose to negotiate with the State of Colorado, the United States, and <br />other parties. In 1986, the negotiating parties entered into the Colorado Ute Indian Water <br />Rights Settlement Agreement ( "1986 Settlement Agreement "), which formed the basis of the <br />Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100 -585 (102. Stat. 2973) <br />( "1988 Settlement Act "). <br />In 1991 the State of Colorado the Ute Tribes, and the United States entered into a <br />Stipulation for a Consent Decree, resulting in the Division 7 Court's Consent Decrees entered <br />December 19, 1991 in Case Nos. W- 1603 -76A through K. The 1991 Consent Decrees <br />incorporated the 1986 Settlement Agreement and the 1988 Settlement Act. The Stipulations <br />filed in Case Nos. W- 1603 -76F and W- 1603 -76J provided that Ute Tribal claims on the Animas <br />and La Plata Rivers were to be satisfied by allocating a certain quantity of water from ALP to the <br />Ute Tribes for agricultural and municipal and industrial uses. <br />The settlement authorized in the 1988 Settlement Act (and decreed in W- 1603 -76F and <br />W- 1603 -76J) was not implemented due to endangered species, water quality, and other <br />' The FSEIS contemplates that Project users will dip into the Inactive Pool to meet demands in times of shortage. <br />The reservoir's Live Storage Capacity is 115,075 af. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.