ALP 3

Contents
Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for Survival versus psi
For the test of psi versus survival for FHM at 0 hrs after sleeve valve passage, we found a
statistically significant difference between the levels tested (F 4,44 = 19.23, p <.0001) using
Statistical Analysis System software 9.3 (SAS). Using a Tukey's Studentized Range pairwise
comparison test, we determined 41 psi had better survival at 0 hrs and was statistically
significant from the other subsequent pressures tested. All of the other survival rates at 0 hrs for
FHM (50, 58, 62, and 71) were not significantly different from one another (alpha 0.05). As part
of the analysis, the test also produced a probability table of the mMimum and maximum
proportion of survival at each psi level tested based on the number of replicates and fish used for
each trial (table 14).
Psi
N
Obs
N
Bean
Std Dcv
Minimum
Maximum
41
10
10
0.0410000
0.0198325
0.0100000
0.0750000
50
9
9
0.0127778
0.0109291
0
0.0350000
59
10
10
0.0135000
0.0117969
0
0.0300000
62
10
10
0.0015000
0.0047434
0
0.0150000
71
10
10
0.0010000
0.0031623
0
0.0100000
Table ld l'rruliable:sleeve vW j3assage fivival of FHM at 0 hrs for each psi level tested.
For the test of psi versus survival fttr-FHM at 96 firs after sleeve valve passage, we found a
statistieally.significant difference between the levels tested (F 4,44 = 11.48, p <.0001) using SAS.
Using the Tukey's Studentized "Range pairwise comparison test, we determined 41 psi had better
survival at 951u ';and was significantly significant from the subsequent pressures tested. All of
the other survival rates at 96 hrs 50, 58, 62, and 71) after sleeve valve passage were not
statistically different.ft m one: iother (alpha 0.05). As part of the analysis, the test also
produced a probability tablef the minimum and maximum proportion of survival at each psi
level tested based on the number of replicates and fish used for each trial (table 15).
Page 58