Laserfiche WebLink
Loan Feasibility Study for <br />Raw Water Acquisition and Utilization <br />Page 36 <br />Base water sales are a result of the assessment per ERU of a base water rate that entitles the user to <br />consume up to 2,000 gallons of water per month. Revenue from base water sales have steadily <br />increased over the six year period contained within the table. <br />Water sales consumption figures account for revenues generated from water consumption on a <br />monthly basis in excess of the 2,000 gallons provided to the users within the base water sales rate. <br />This number has fluctuated as a direct result of restrictions put in place by the District. Said <br />restrictions are recapped within Table 7, the District's historical water rate structure. Those <br />restrictions came about as a result of severe drought conditions being experienced within the region <br />which directly impacted the availability of the District's underlying water supply. Conservation <br />practices have continued on the part of the District's constituents as a result of their increased <br />sensitivity to the availability of water coupled with the District's $3.90 per 1,000 gallon assessment <br />for water consumption over 2,000 gallons per month. Water sales consumption income levels are <br />now increasing and beginning to approach those of 2001. <br />In a similar manner, tap fee revenues have fluctuated dramatically. This again is directly attributable <br />to the District's imposition of a tap moratorium in response to its limited water supply brought about <br />by drought conditions. The moratorium was put into affect in April 2002 and continued through <br />April of 2004. Tap fee income has shown recovery, but also reflects reduced demand, in part, due to <br />the $12,000 tap fee now assessed per ERU by the District. <br />Table 10 provides a summary of total income excluding grants and loans. The grants and loans are <br />related to capital construction. Their incorporation is shown in the subsequent total income figure. <br />The large loan in excess of $3,000,000 appearing in 2005 reflects the interim financing secured by <br />the District from the Fremont Bank for acquisition of the Goodwin Ranch and associated water <br />rights. The $4.2 million anticipated loan in 2006 is associated with securing a CWCB loan and <br />implementing a portion of the project needed to convey and store the District's acquired water <br />rights. The CWCB loan budgeted for in 2006 in reality will not occur until July of 2007 based upon <br />CWCB's normal review, approval, and funding allocation process. <br />Total annual income received by the District as recapped within the table shows a reduction in gross <br />income driven by drought conditions and the District's response in the form of both water use <br />restrictions and a tap moratorium. With drought conditions easing and the removal of the water use <br />restrictions and tap moratorium, the overall income level documented in 2005 has once again <br />exceeded that from 2001 and is projected to remain at approximately the same level in 2006. <br />A review of the expenditures made by the District over the same period of time is necessary to <br />establish the overall viability of the District's current water user charge system and related revenue <br />sources. Table 11 presents District expenditures over the same period of time as that of the revenues <br />presented in Table 10. It highlights the major categories of expenditures as presented within the <br />District's audits, year end balance statements, and the 2006 budget. <br />Leonard Rice Engineers, Inc. August 2006 — 1018PEN05 <br />GMS, Inc. <br />