My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-08CW056 Supplemental Data
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
2-08CW056 Supplemental Data
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2016 11:27:28 PM
Creation date
3/11/2013 10:39:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
08CW0056
Stream Name
Severy Creek
Watershed
Fountain
Water Division
2
Water District
10
County
El Paso
Teller
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 0 <br />Field Survey Data & Biological Flow Quantification <br />TU and CDOW staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water <br />required to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross <br />method requires that stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle <br />stream habitat type. Riffles are most easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that <br />would dry up first should streamflow cease. This type of hydraulic data collection <br />consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream channel geometry, and measuring <br />the stream discharge. Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to <br />interpret output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream <br />flow recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique <br />biologic requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream <br />flow hydraulic parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity <br />are used to develop biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has <br />determined that maintaining these three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across <br />riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools and runs will also be maintained for most life <br />stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring 1979; Espegren 1996). <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 <br />below. Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected <br />(Date), the measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the <br />predicted flows based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow <br />recommendation based on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow <br />recommendation based upon 2 of 3 hydraulic criteria. <br />Table 1: Severy Creek R2Cross Summary <br />* Recommendations based on meeting specified number of hydrologic criteria (average depth, percent wetted perimeter and average <br />velocity). <br />Hydrologic Data and Analysis <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff <br />conducted an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically <br />available for an instream flow appropriation. This evaluation was done through a <br />computation that is, in essence, a "water balance ". In concept a "water balance" <br />computation can be viewed as an accounting exercise. When done in its most rigorous <br />form, the water balance parses precipitation into all the avenues water pursues after it is <br />deposited as rain, snow, or ice. In other words, given a specified amount of water <br />deposition (input), the balance tries to account for all water depletions (losses) until a <br />selected end point is reached. Water losses include depletions due to evaporation and <br />transpiration, deliveries into ground water storage, temporary surface storage, <br />incorporations into plant and animal tissue and so forth. These losses are individually or <br />-3- <br />Confidence Interval (cfs) <br />Recommended Flows * (cfs) <br />Party <br />Date <br />Q (cfs) <br />250 % -40% <br />Summer 3/3 <br />Winter 2/3 <br />TU <br />7/28/2006 <br />0.87 <br />2.2-0.3 <br />1.54 <br />1 0.79 <br />* Recommendations based on meeting specified number of hydrologic criteria (average depth, percent wetted perimeter and average <br />velocity). <br />Hydrologic Data and Analysis <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff <br />conducted an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically <br />available for an instream flow appropriation. This evaluation was done through a <br />computation that is, in essence, a "water balance ". In concept a "water balance" <br />computation can be viewed as an accounting exercise. When done in its most rigorous <br />form, the water balance parses precipitation into all the avenues water pursues after it is <br />deposited as rain, snow, or ice. In other words, given a specified amount of water <br />deposition (input), the balance tries to account for all water depletions (losses) until a <br />selected end point is reached. Water losses include depletions due to evaporation and <br />transpiration, deliveries into ground water storage, temporary surface storage, <br />incorporations into plant and animal tissue and so forth. These losses are individually or <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.