My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation With Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-Charge Deliveries
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation With Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-Charge Deliveries
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2013 4:58:00 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 3:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
For the River Colorado Water Conservancy District
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
1
Date
10/1/2000
Author
Helton & Williamsen, P.C.
Title
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation with Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-charge Deliveries
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
charge deliveries averaged 37,800 acre -feet annually or about 18 percent of the total delivered. <br />These deliveries were made when Granby Reservoir on the west slope was expected to spill, <br />and were not counted against the delivery allotments made to the C -BT unit holders. Although <br />the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and USBR refer to this non - charge water as <br />"delivered ", it appears that the water was, for the most part, released to the several streams in <br />the project area and turned over to the Water Commissioner for distribution under the priority <br />system. We evaluated whether these deliveries were made when shortages were occurring to <br />the water users in the stream system. Such shortages, which were not limited to those of just C- <br />BT unit holders, would have occurred when the water users on the stream were using the entire <br />native water supply available to them and were needing or wanting additional water. In other <br />words, there should have been a dry section on the stream when non - charge deliveries were <br />made. As will be discussed later, the non - charge deliveries to the Big Thompson River <br />averaged 8,720 acre -feet annually during 1983 -98, and our analysis indicated that the non - <br />charge deliveries were not fully diverted by the water users. <br />Big Thompson River water is diverted into the Olympus and Dille Tunnels either as <br />' "skim" water or "in- priority" project diversions. Depending on the physical availability and power <br />requirements, skim water is diverted, run through the C -BT system and thereby used to <br />' generate power, and then discharged back to the Big Thompson River at the Big Thompson <br />Powerplant or the Big Thompson Wasteway. In general, skim water is diverted on a given day at <br />a variable rate and returned to the Big Thompson River the next day at a uniform rate. Although <br />' some records for the in- priority project diversions are available from the USBR and the Colorado <br />Division of Water Resources, they do, not appear to be complete. <br />In order to estimate the in- priority diversions of Big Thompson River water, the C -BT <br />operations on the Big Thompson River during 1983 -98 were evaluated as shown in Table 6. <br />' The C -BT diversions of Big Thompson River water (column 5) were calculated by subtracting <br />the Adams Tunnel diversions (column 2) from the total diversions into the Olympus and Dille <br />Tunnels (columns 3 and 4). These diversions of Big Thompson River water averaged 53,550 <br />acre -feet annually. As indicated above, some of both Big Thompson River water and west slope <br />water brought through the Adams Tunnel was discharged back to the Big Thompson River <br />' through the Big Thompson Powerplant and Wasteway. The total discharges back to the Big <br />Thompson River (column 8) averaged 88,960 acre -feet annually. The west slope water <br />discharged back to the Big Thompson River (column 9), which is accounted for in the USBR <br />' records as deliveries of C -BT Project water to C -BT users, averaged 42,120 acre -feet annually. <br />The remaining discharges to the Big Thompson River (column 9), therefore, were Big <br />' Thompson River water and averaged 46,840 acre -feet annually. Since the total diversions of Big <br />Thompson River water averaged 53,550 acre -feet annually and the returns of Big Thompson <br />River water averaged 46,840 acre -feet annually, the Big Thompson River water retained in the <br />C -BT system (column 11) averaged 6,710 acre -feet annually. The negative value indicated for <br />1992 would seem to indicate an out -of- priority diversion of Big Thompson River water. The <br />Adams Tunnel diversions in column 2 do not agree exactly with those from Table 2 because the <br />values in column 2 were obtained from the daily CDSS records rather than the monthly USGS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.