My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation With Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-Charge Deliveries
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation With Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-Charge Deliveries
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2013 4:58:00 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 3:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
For the River Colorado Water Conservancy District
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
1
Date
10/1/2000
Author
Helton & Williamsen, P.C.
Title
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation with Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-charge Deliveries
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
than 6,710 acre -feet annually or less than one -third of the total available was actually <br />diverted. <br />2. The full utilization of the Big Thompson River source water would have reduced the <br />Adams Tunnel diversions that were necessary to supply the historical project demands. <br />' Our analysis indicated that the Adams Tunnel diversions could have been reduced by an <br />average of approximately 15,200 acre -feet annually. Reduced Adams Tunnel diversions <br />would have increased the spills from Granby Reservoir by an average of approximately <br />13,000 acre -feet annually and would have reduced target flow shortages in the 15 -Mile <br />Reach by an average of more than approximately 3,600 acre -feet annually. <br />' 3. Our analysis showed that Carter Lake and Horsetooth Reservoir can be operated so that <br />all or nearly all of the in- priority Big Thompson River water can be diverted and made <br />part of the project water supply without reducing the historical yield to the C -BT unit <br />owners. <br />4. The C -BT Project delivered an annual average 37,800 acre -feet of non - charge water <br />during 1983 -98. These non - charge deliveries occurred in 1983 -87 and 1995 -98 (9 of the <br />16 years in the study period) and amounted to about 18 percent of the total deliveries. <br />The non - charge deliveries exceeded 100,000 acre -feet in 1986 and 1987 and <br />approached 100,000 acre -feet in 1997. Prior to 1983, non - charge deliveries occurred in <br />only 1962 and 1971. <br />5. The deliveries of non - charge water to the Big Thompson River, averaging 8,730 acre - <br />feet annually during 1983 -98, were not fully diverted by the water users on the Big <br />Thompson River. Our flow calculations and comparisons indicated that an average of <br />3,423 acre -feet of this water was not diverted by Big Thompson River water users. Thus, <br />an average of 39.3 percent of the total went undiverted on the Big Thompson River. <br />While this analysis considered only water uses on the Big Thompson River, the fact that <br />calls were not occurring on the South Platte River on the days when this undiverted non- <br />charge water was being delivered would indicate that it was not being diverted or used <br />on the South Platte River either. Our inspection of the records for the flow in the South <br />Platte River downstream from the mouth of the Big Thompson River tends to confirm <br />this. Also, our inspection of the flow records for the Cache La Poudre for the times when <br />the non - charge deliveries were being made indicated that similar conclusions can be <br />made with respect to the non - charge deliveries to the Cache La Poudre. <br />6. Reductions in the non - charge deliveries during 1983 -98 obviously would have reduced <br />the Adams Tunnel diversions and the target flow shortages in the 15 -Mile Reach. Our <br />analysis indicated that the elimination of the non - charge deliveries would have reduced <br />the target flow shortages by an average of approximately 13,300 acre -feet annually <br />when combined with increased utilization of the C -BT Project's Big Thompson River <br />water supply. <br />K <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.